We have now examined the Calvinistic system in considerable detail,
and have seen its influence in the Church, in the State, in society, and in education. We
have also considered the objections which are commonly brought against it, and have
considered the practical importance of the system. It now remains for us to make a few
general observations in regard to the system as a whole.
A sure test of the character of
individuals or of systems is found in Christ's own words: "By their fruits ye shall
know them." By that test Calvinists and Calvinism will gladly be judged. The lives
and the influences of those who have held the Reformed Faith is one of the best and most
conclusive arguments in its favor. Smith refers to "that divinely vital and exuberant
Calvinism, !he creator of the modern world, the mother of heroes, saints and martyrs in
number without number, which history, judging the tree by its fruits, crowns as the
greatest creed of Christendom."1 The impartial verdict of history is that
as a character builder and as a proclaimer of liberty to men and nations Calvinism stands
supreme among all the religious systems of the world. In calling the roll of the great men
of our own country the number of Presbyterian presidents, legislators, jurists, authors,
editors, teachers and business men is vastly disproportionate to the membership of
the Church. Every impartial historian will admit that it was the Protestant revolt against
Rome which gave the modern world its first taste of genuine religious and civil liberty,
and,that the nations which have achieved and enjoyed the greatest freedom have been those
which were most fully brought under the influence of Calvinism. Furthermore that great
life-giving stream of religious and civil liberty has been made by Calvinism to flow over
all the broad plains of modern history. When we compare countries such as England,
Scotland and America, with countries such as France, Spain and Italy, which never came
under the influences of Calvinism, we readily see what the practical results are. The
economic and moral depression in Roman Catholic countries has brought about such a
decrease even in the birth rate that the population in those countries hah become almost
stationary, while the population in these other countries has steadily increased.
A brief examination of Church history, or
of the historic creeds of Protestantism, readily shows that the doctrines which today are
known as Calvinism were the ones which brought about the Reformation and preserved its
benefits. He who is most familiar with the history of Europe and America will readily
agree with the startling statement of Dr. Cunningham that, "next to Paul, John Calvin
has done most for the world." And Dr. Smith has well said: "Surely it should
stop the mouths of the detractors of Calvinism to remember that from men of that creed we
inherit, as the fruits of their blood and toil, their prayers and teachings, our civil
liberty, our Protestant faith, our Christian homes. The thoughtful reader, noting that
these three blessings lie at the root of all that is best and greatest in the modern
world, may be startled at the implied claim that our present Christian civilization is but
the fruitage of Calvinism."2
We do but repeat the very clear testimony
of history when we say that Calvinism has been the creed of saints and heroes.
"Whatever the cause," says Froude, "the Calvinists were the only fighting
Protestants. It was they whose faith gave them courage to stand up for the Reformation,
and but for them the Reformation would have been lost." During those centuries in
which spiritual tyranny was numbering its victims by the thousands; when in England,
Scotland, Holland and Switzerland, Protestantism had to maintain itself with the sword,
Calvinism proved itself the only system able to cope with and destroy the great powers of
the Romish Church. Its unequalled array of martyrs is one of its crowns of glory. In the
address of the Methodist Conference to the Presbyterian Alliance of 1896 it was graciously
said: "Your Church has furnished the memorable and inspiring spectacle, not simply of
a solitary heroic soul here and there, but of generations of faithful souls ready for the
sake of Christ and His truth to go cheerfully to prison and to death. This rare honor you
rightly esteem as the most precious part of your priceless heritage." "There is
no other system of religion in the world," says McFetridge, which has such a glorious
array of martyrs to the faith. "Almost every man and woman who walked to the flames
rather than deny the faith or leave a stain on conscience was the devout follower, not
only, and first of all, of the Son of God, but also of that minister of God who made
Geneva the light of Europe, John Calvin."3 To the Divine vitality and
fruitfulness of this system the modern world owes a debt of gratitude which in recent
years it is slowly beginning to recognize but can never repay.
We have said that Calvinistic theology
develops a liberty loving people. Where it flourishes despotism cannot abide. As might
have been expected, it early gave rise to a revolutionary form of Church government, in
which the people of the Church were to be governed and ministered to, not by the
appointees of any one man or set of men placed over them, but by pastors and officers
elected by themselves. Religion was then with the people, not over them. Testimony from a
remarkable source as to the efficiency of this government is that of the distinguished
Roman Catholic, Archbishop Hughes of New York: "Though it is my privilege to regard
the authority exercised by the General Assembly as usurpation, still I must say, with
every man acquainted with the mode in which it is organized, that for the purpose of
popular and political government its structure is little inferior to that of Congress
itself. It acts on the principle of a radiating center, and is without an equal or a rival
among the other denominations of the country."4
From freedom and responsibility in the
Church it was only a step to freedom and responsibility in the State; and historically the
cause of freedom has found no braver nor more resolute champions than the followers of
"Calvinism," says Warburton,
"is no dreamy, theoretical creed. It does not, despite all the assertions of
its adversaries, encourage a man to fold his arms in a spirit of fatalistic
indifference, and ignore the needs of those around him, together with the crying evils
which lie, like putrifying sores, upon the open face of society."5
Wherever it has gone marvelous moral transformations have followed in its wake. For purity
of life, for temperance, industry, and charity, the Calvinists have stood without
James Anthony Froude has been recognized
as one of England's most able historians and men of letters. For a number of years he was
professor of History at Oxford, England's greatest university. While he accepted another
system for himself, and while his writings are such that he is often spoken of as an
opponent of Calvinism, he was free from prejudice, and the ignorant attacks upon Calvinism
which have been so common in recent years aroused in him the learned scholar's just
"I am going to ask you," says
Froude, "to consider how it came to pass that if Calvinism is indeed the hard and
unreasonable creed which modern enlightenment declares it to be, it has possessed such
singular attractions in past times for some of the greatest men that ever lived; and how
being as we are told, fatal to morality, because it denies free will the
first symptom of its operation, wherever it established itself, was to obliterate the
distinction between sins and crimes, and to make the moral law the rule of life for States
as well as persons. I shall ask you, again, why, if it be a creed of intellectual
servitude, it was able to inspire and sustain the bravest efforts ever made by man to
break the yoke of unjust authority. When all else has failed, when patriotism has
covered its face and human courage has broken down, when intellect has yielded, as
Gibbon says, 'with a smile or a sigh,' content to philosophize in the closet, and abroad
worship with the vulgar, when emotion, and sentiment, and tender imaginative piety
have become the handmaids of superstition, and have dreamt themselves into forgetfulness
that there is any difference between lies and truth, the slavish form of belief
called Calvinism, in one or other of its many forms, has borne ever an inflexible front to
illusion and mendacity, and has preferred rather to be ground to powder like flint than to
bend before violence or melt under enervating temptation."
To illustrate this Froude mentions William
the Silent, Luther, Calvin, Knox, Coligny, Cromwell, Milton, and Bunyan, and says of them:
"These men are possessed of all the qualities which give nobility and grandeur to
human nature, men whose life was as upright as their intellect was commanding and
their public aims untainted with selfishness; unalterably just where duty required them to
be stern, but with the tenderness of a woman in their hearts; frank, true, cheerful,
humorous, as unlike sour fanatics as it is possible to imagine anyone, and able in some
way to sound the key-note to which every brave and faithful heart in Europe instinctively
We shall now turn our attention to
Calvinism as an evangelizing force. A very practical test for any system of religious
doctrine is, "Has it, in comparison with other systems, proved itself a success in
the evangelization of the world ?" To save sinners and convert them to practical
godliness is the chief purpose of the Church in this world; and the system which will not
measure up to this test must be set aside, no matter how popular it may be in other
The first great Christian revival, in
which three thousand people were converted, occurred under the preaching of Peter in
Jerusalem, who employed such language as this: "Him being delivered up by the
determinate council and foreknowledge of God, ye by the hands of lawless men did crucify
and slay," Acts 2:23. And the company of disciples, when in earnest prayer shortly
afterward, spoke in these words: "For of a truth in this city against thy holy
servant Jesus, whom thou didst anoint, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles
and the peoples of Israel, were gathered together, to do whatsoever thy hand and thy
counsel foreordained to come to pass," Acts 4:27, 28. That is Calvinism rigid enough.
The next great revival in the Church,
which occurred in the fourth century through the influence of Augustine, was based
on these doctrines, as is readily seen by anyone who reads the literature on that period.
The Reformation, which is admitted by all to have been incomparably the greatest revival
of true religion since New Testament times, occurred under the soundly predestinarian
preaching of Luther, Zwingli, and Calvin. To Calvin and Admiral Coligny belongs the credit
of having inspired the first Protestant foreign missionary enterprise, the expedition to
Brazil in 1555. True, the venture proved unsuccessful, and the religious wars in Europe
prevented the renewal of the enterprise for a considerable period.
McFetridge has given us some interesting
and comparatively unknown facts about the rise of the Methodist Church. Says he: "We
speak of the Methodist Church beginning in a revival. And so it did. But the first and
chief actor in that revival was not Wesley, but Whitefield (an uncompromising Calvinist).
Though a younger man than Wesley, it was he who first went forth preaching in the fields
and gathering multitudes of followers, and raising money and building chapels. It was
Whitefield who invoked the two Wesleys to his aid. And he had to employ much argument and
persuasion to overcome their prejudices against the movement. Whitefield began the great
work at Bristol and Kingswood, and had found thousands flocking to his side, ready to be
organized into churches, when he appealed to Wesley for assistance. Wesley, with all his
zeal, had been quite a High-Churchman in many of his views. He believed in immersing even
the infants, and demanded that dissenters should be rebaptized before being taken into the
Church. He could not think of preaching in any place but in a church. 'He should have
thought,' as he said, 'the saving of souls almost a sin if it had not been done in a
church.' Hence when Whitefield called on John Wesley to engage with him in the popular
movement, he shrank back. Finally, he yielded to Whitefield's persuasions, but, he allowed
himself to be governed in the decision by what many would rate as a superstition. He and
Charles first opened their Bibles at random to see if their eyes should fall on a text
which might decide them. But the texts were all foreign to the subject. Then he had
recourse to sortilege, and cast lots to decide the matter. The lot drawn was the one
marked for him to consent, and so he consented. Thus he was led to undertake the work with
which his name has been so intimately and honorably associated ever since.
"So largely was the Methodist
movement owing to Whitefield that he was called 'the Calvinistic establisher of Methodism,'
and to the end of his life he remained the representative of it in the eyes of the
learned world. Walpole, in his Letters, speaks only once of Wesley in connection with the
rise of Methodism, while he frequently speaks of Whitefield in connection with it.
Mant, in his course of lectures against Methodism, speaks of it as an entirely Calvinistic
affair. Neither the mechanism nor the force which gave rise to it originated with Wesley.
Field-preaching, which gave the whole movement its aggressive character, and fitted and
enabled it to cope with the powerful agencies which were armed against it, was begun by
Whitefield, whilst 'Wesley was dragged into it reluctantly.' In the polite language of the
day 'Calvinism' and 'Methodism' were synonymous terms, and the Methodists were
called 'another sect of Presbyterians.' ....
"It was Calvinism, and
not Arminianism, which originated (so far as any system of doctrine originated) the great
religious movement in which the Methodist Church was born.
"While, therefore, Wesley is to be
honored for his work in behalf of that Church, we should not fail to remember the great
Calvinist, George Whitefield, who gave that Church her first beginnings and her most
distinctive character. Had he lived longer, and not shrunk from the thought of being the
founder of a Church, far different would have been the results of his labors. As it was,
he gathered congregations for others to form into Churches, and built chapels for others
to preach in."7
It should also be said at this point that
Wesley was a believer in witchcraft. Failure to believe in witches was looked upon by him
as a concession to infidels and rationalists. Many of his biographers have passed over
this subject in silence, although some of those most friendly to his cause have admitted
that he stated his beliefs in words which cannot be misunderstood. In his Journal we read
this report of a girl who was subject to fits: "When old Doctor Alexander was asked
what her disorder was, he answered, 'It is what formerly they would have called being
bewitched.' And why should they not call it so now? Because the infidels have hooted
witchcraft out of the world; and the complaisant Christians, in large numbers, have joined
them in the cry." Although Calvin lived two and a quarter centuries before Wesley and
had not the advantages of the scientific and intellectual progress that had been made
during that time, we find no such strange credulity in him. His writings are not only free
from witchcraft but contain numerous warnings against such belief.
The famous English Baptist Charles Hadden
Spurgeon (1834-1892), one of the world's greatest preachers, spoke as follows:
"I am never ashamed to avow myself a
Calvinist. I do not hesitate to take the name of Baptist; but if I am asked what is my
creed, I reply, 'It is Jesus Christ.'"
And again, "Many of our Calvinistic
preachers do not feed God's people. They believe election, but they do not preach it. They
think particular redemption true, but they lock it in the chest of their creed, and never
bring it out in their ministry. They hold final perseverance, but they persevere in
keeping quiet about it. They think there is such a thing as effectual calling, but they do
not think they are called frequently to preach it. The great fault we find with them is,
that they do not speak right out what they believe. You could not know if you heard them
fifty times what were the doctrines of the Gospel, or what was their system of salvation.
And hence God's people get starved."
When we come to a study of foreign
missions we find that this system of belief has been the most important agency in carrying
the Gospel to the heathen nations. St. Paul, whom the more liberal opponents of Calvinism
admit to have been responsible for the Calvinistic cast of the theological thought of the
Church, was the greatest and most influential of missionaries. If we call the roll of the
hemes of Protestant Missions we find that almost without exception they have been
disciples of Calvin. We find Carey and Martyn in India, Linvingstone and Moffat in Africa,
Morrison in China, Paton in the South Seas, and a great host of others. These men
professed and possessed a Calvinism which was not static but dynamic; it was not their
creed only, but their conduct.
And in regard to foreign missions, Dr. F.
W. Loetscher has said: "Though like all our sister Churches we have reason, in view
of our unprecedented resources and the appalling needs of heathen lands, to lament that we
have not accomplished more, we may at least thank God that our venerated fathers made so
good a beginning in establishing missions all over the world; that the Calvinistic
Churches today surpass all others in their gifts to this cause; and in particular that our
own denomination has the unique honor and privilege of discharging her far-reaching
responsibities by actually confronting every one of the great non-Christian religions, and
preaching the gospel on more continents, and among more nations, peoples, and tongues,
than any other evangelical Church in the world."8
Although to some it may sound like an
unwarranted exaggeration, we have no hesitation in saying that through the centuries
Calvinism, fearlessly and ringingly polemic in its insistence upon, and defense of, sound
doctrine, has been the real strength of the Christian Church. The traditionally high
standards of the Calvinistic Churches in regard to ministerial training and culture have
borne a great harvest in bringing multitudes to the feet of Jesus, not in temporary
excitement, but in perpetual covenant. Judged by its fruits Calvinism has proven itself
incomparably the greatest evangelizing force in the world.
The enemies of Calvinism are not able
honestly to confront the testimony of history. Certainly a glorious record belongs to this
system in the history of modern civilization. None more noble can be found anywhere. "It
has ever been a mystery to the so-called liberals," says Henry Ward Beecher,
"that the Calvinists, with what they have considered their harshly despotic and rigid
views and doctrines, should always have been the staunchest and bravest defenders of
freedom. The working for liberty of these severe principles in the minds of those that
adopted them has been a puzzle. But the truth lies here: Calvinism has done what no other
religion has ever been able to do. It presents the highest human ideal to the world, and
sweeps the whole road to destruction with the most appalling battery that can be imagined.
"It intensifies, beyond all example,
the individuality of man, and shows in a clear and overpowering light his responsibility
to God and his relations to eternity. It points out man as entering life under the weight
of a tremendous responsibility, having on his march toward the grave, this one sole solace
of securing heaven and of escaping hell.
"Thus the Calvinist sees man pressed,
burdened, urged on, by the most mighty influencing forces. He is on the march for
eternity, and is soon to stand crowned in heaven or to lie sweltering in hell, thus to
continue for ever and ever. Who shall dare to fetter such a being? Get out of his way !
Hinder him not, or do it at the peril of your own soul. Leave him free to find his way to
God. Meddle not with him or with his rights. Let him work out his own salvation as he can.
No hand must be laid crushingly upon a creature who is on such a race as this a
race whose end is to be eternal glory or unutterable woe for ever and ever."9
"This tree," to adopt the
eloquent paragraph of another, "may have, to prejudiced eyes, a rough bark, a gnarled
stem, and boughs twisted often into knotted shapes of ungraceful strength. But, remember,
it is not a willow-wand of yesterday. These boughs have wrestled with the storms of a
thousand years; this stem has been wreathed with the red lightning and scarred by the
thunderbolt; and all over its rough rind are the marks of the battle-axe and the bullet.
This old oak has not the pliant grace and silky softness of a greenhouse plant, but it has
a majesty above grace, and a grandeur beyond beauty. Its roots may be strangely contorted,
but some of them are rich with the blood of glorious battlefields, some of them are
clasped around the stakes of martyrs; some of them hidden in solitary cells and lonely
libraries, where deep thinkers have mused and prayed, as in some apocalyptic Patmos; and
its great tap-root runs back, until it twines in living and loving embrace around the
cross of Calvary. Its boughs may be gnarled, but they hang clad with all that is richest
and strongest in the civilization and Christianity of human history."10
As we survey this system we feel as one
sitting at the manual of a great organ. Our fingers touch the keys, as stop after stop
opens of the swell, until the full chorus responds, a grand harmony. Calvinism touches all
the music of life because it seeks the Creator first and above all and finds Him
everywhere. Or again, we have been out upon the deep, the great celestial dome overhead,
the wide expanse of eternity all around our souls and in and above all, there is GOD. Or
again, we stand, as it were, at the rifting of the rocks, with the landscape behind, the
gorge before us, the mighty river of time flowing forth out of and into eternity, the sun
in its zenith overhead, all ablaze with light and warmth, and in a whisper first, our
souls have echoed back the words, "0 the depth of the riches!" For Calvinism
shows us God and traces His footsteps, God, in all His greatness, majesty, wisdom,
holiness, justice, love. Calvinism shows us God high and lifted up; and our souls cry out
again, "What is man that THOU . . . art mindful of him?"
This is no vain and empty eulogy of
Calvinism. With the above facts and observations every enlightened and impartial reader of
history will agree. Furthermore, the author would say of this book what Dr. E. W. Smith in
his book, "The Creed of Presbyterians," said at the close of the chapter on,
"The Creed Tested By Its Fruits," namely that these facts and
observations are "set forth, not to stimulate denominational vanity, but to fill us
with gratitude to God for that past history and that present eminence which should be to
every one of us
'A vantage-ground for nobleness';
and above all to kindle in our hearts a
holy enthusiasm for that Divine system of truth, which, under God, has been the foremost
factor in the making of America and the modern world."
In conclusion we would say that in this
book the reader has found some very old-fashioned divinity divinity as old as the
Bible, as old and older than the world itself, since this plan of redemption was hidden in
the eternal counsels of God. No attempt has been made to cloak the fact that the doctrines
advocated and defended in these pages are really wonderful and startling. They are enough
to electrify the sleepy sinner who has taken it for granted all his life long that he can
square matters with God any time he pleases, and they are sufficient to horrify the sleepy
"saint" who has been deluding himself in the deadening repose of a carnal
religion. But why should they not cause astonishment ? Does not nature teem with wonders ?
Why should not revelation ? One needs to read but little to become aware that Science
brings to light many astonishing truths which an uneducated man finds it hard, if not
impossible, to believe; and why should it not be so with the truths of Revelation and the
spiritually uneducated ? If the Gospel does not startle and terrify and amaze a man when
presented to him, it is not the true Gospel. But who was ever amazed at Arminianism with
its doctrine that every man carves out his own destiny? It will not suffice merely to
ignore or ridicule these doctrines as many are inclined to do. The question is, Are these
doctrines true? If they are true, why ridicule them? If they are not true, disprove them.
We close with the statement that this great system of religious thought which bears
Calvin's name is nothing more or less than the hope of the world.
1The Creed of Presbyterians, p.
2The Creed of Presbyterians, p. 74.
3Calvinism in History, p. 113.
4Presbyterians and the Revolution, p. 140.
5Calvinism. p. 78
6Calvinism, p. 8.
7Calvinism in History, pp. 151-153.
8Address before the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A., 1929.
9Plymouth Pulpit, article, Calvinism.
10Power and Claims of a Calvinistic Literature, p. 35, quoted from Smith, The
Creed of Presbyterians, p. 105.