|
Paras |
|
|
1 |
I. The norm of good works |
|
|
|
|
|
A. Positively stated |
|
|
B. Negatively stated |
|
|
|
|
2 |
II. The importance of good works |
|
|
|
|
|
A. Because of their testimony |
|
|
B. Because of their results |
|
|
C. Because of their role |
|
|
|
|
3 |
III. The cause of good works |
|
|
|
|
|
A. Its emphatic assertion |
|
|
B. Its common perversion |
|
|
|
|
4-5 |
IV. The limitations of good works |
|
|
|
|
4 |
A. Works of supererogation are impossible |
|
5 |
B. Works of merit are impossible |
|
|
|
|
6-7 |
V. The acceptance of good works |
|
|
|
|
6 |
A. The good works of believers |
|
7 |
B. The good works of unregenerate men |
|
|
|
From: Samuel E. Waldron, A Modern Exposition of the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith, (Evangelical Press, 1989), p207. Used by permission.
