| |
Chapter 8, Paragraph 4, reference e: it appears that the reference
to Acts 1:10 in the original manuscript is an error. Most modern versions
have Acts 1:11, which seems more relevant.
Chapter 10, paragraph 1, reference a : it appears that the reference
to 2 Thessalonians 3:13-14 in the original manuscript is an error. Most
modern versions have 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14, which seems more relevant.
Chapter 26, paragraph 3, reference d: Most modern versions cite
1 Corinthians 5 rather than 1 Corinthians 15 here.
Chapter 29, paragraph 2, reference d: it appears that the reference
to Acts 26:16 in the original manuscript is an error. Most modern versions
have Acts 22:16 which seems more relevant.
Chapter 27, paragraph 2, reference e: it appears that the reference to
Acts 12:29,30 in the original manuscript is an error (Acts 12:29,30 do
not exists). Most modern versions cite Acts 11:29,30.
Chapter 32, paragraph 3, reference i: it appears that the reference
to Luke 13:35,36 in the original manuscript is an error (Luke 13:36 does
not exist). Most modern versions have Luke 12:35-40.
Many today who hold firmly to the 1677/89 Confession cannot agree with
this dogmatic identification of the Pope of Rome as the antichrist of 2
Thessalonians 2:2-9.
Dr James M. Renihan
Institute of Reformed Baptist Studies
P.O. Box 300771
Escondido, CA 92030-0771
USA
|
