| |
This expanded electronic edition of the J-F-B Commentary is in the public domain.
[Table of Contents]
[Previous]
[Next]
|
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
|
THE FIRST GENERAL EPISTLE OF
JOHN
Commentary by A. R. FAUSSETT
[1] [2]
[3] [4]
[5]
INTRODUCTION
AUTHORSHIP.--POLYCARP, the
disciple of John [Epistle to the Philippians, 7], quotes
1Jo 4:3.
EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical History, 3.39]
says of PAPIAS, a hearer of John, and a friend of
POLYCARP, "He used testimonies from the First
Epistle of John." IRENÆUS, according to
EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical History, 5.8],
often quoted this Epistle. So in his work Against Heresies
[3.15; 5, 8] he quotes from John by name,
1Jo 2:18,
&c.; and in [3.16,7], he quotes
1Jo 4:1-3; 5:1,
and 2Jo 7, 8.
CLEMENT OF
ALEXANDRIA
[Miscellanies, 2.66, p. 464] refers to
1Jo 5:16,
as in John's larger Epistle. See other quotations
[Miscellanies, 3.32,42; 4.102]. TERTULLIAN
[Against Marcion, 5.16] refers to
1Jo 4:1,
&c.; [Against Praxeas, 15], to
1Jo 1:1.
See his other quotations [Against Praxeas, 28; Against the
Gnostics, 12]. CYPRIAN [Epistles, 28
(24)], quotes as John's,
1Jo 2:3, 4;
and [On the Lord's Prayer, 5] quotes
1Jo 2:15-17;
and [On Works and Alms, 3],
1Jo 1:8;
and [On the Advantage of Patience, 2] quotes
1Jo 2:6.
MURATORI'S Fragment on the Canon of
Scripture states, "There are two of John (the Gospel and Epistle?)
esteemed Catholic," and quotes
1Jo 1:3.
The Peschito Syriac contains it. ORIGEN (in
EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical History, 6.25])
speaks of the First Epistle as genuine, and "probably the second and
third, though all do not recognize the latter two"; on the Gospel of
John, [Commentary on John, 13.2], he quotes
1Jo 1:5.
DIONYSIUS OF ALEXANDRIA,
ORIGEN'S scholar, cites the words of this Epistle
as those of the Evangelist John. EUSEBIUS
[Ecclesiastical History, 3.24], says, John's first Epistle and
Gospel are acknowledged without question by those of the present
day, as well as by the ancients. So also JEROME
[On Illustrious Men]. The opposition of COSMAS INDICOPLEUSTES, in the sixth
century, and that of MARCION because our Epistle
was inconsistent with his views, are of no weight against such
irrefragable testimony.
The internal evidence is equally strong. Neither the Gospel, nor this
Epistle, can be pronounced an imitation; yet both, in style and modes
of thought, are evidently of the same mind. The individual
notices are not so numerous or obvious as in Paul's writings, as was to
be expected in a Catholic Epistle; but such as there are accord
with John's position. He implies his apostleship, and perhaps alludes
to his Gospel, and the affectionate tie which bound him as an
aged pastor to his spiritual "children"; and in
1Jo 2:18, 19; 4:1-3,
he alludes to the false teachers as known to his readers; and in
1Jo 5:21
he warns them against the idols of the surrounding world. It is no
objection against its authenticity that the doctrine of the
Word, or divine second Person, existing from everlasting, and in
due time made flesh, appears in it, as also in the Gospel, as opposed
to the heresy of the Docetæ in the second century, who
denied that our Lord is come in the flesh, and maintained He
came only in outward semblance; for the same doctrine appears in
Col 1:15-18;
1Ti 3:16;
Heb 1:1-3;
and the germs of Docetism, though not fully developed till the second
century, were in existence in the first. The Spirit, presciently
through John, puts the Church beforehand on its guard against the
coming heresy.
TO WHOM ADDRESSED.--AUGUSTINE
[The Question of the Gospels, 2.39], says this Epistle was
written to the Parthians. BEDE, in a
prologue to the seven Catholic Epistles, says that
ATHANASIUS attests the same. By the
Parthians may be meant the Christians living beyond the
Euphrates in the Parthian territory, outside the Roman empire, "the
Church at Babylon elected together with (you)," the churches in the
Ephesian region, the quarter to which Peter addressed his Epistles
(1Pe 5:12).
As Peter addressed the flock which John subsequently tended (and in
which Paul had formerly ministered), so John, Peter's close companion
after the ascension, addresses the flock among whom Peter had been when
he wrote. Thus "the elect lady"
(2Jo 1)
answers "to the Church elected together"
(1Pe 5:13).
See further confirmation of this view in
Introduction
to Second John. It is not necessarily an objection to this view that
John never is known to have personally ministered in the Parthian
territory. For neither did Peter personally minister to the churches in
Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, Bithynia, though he wrote his
Epistles to them. Moreover, in John's prolonged life, we cannot
dogmatically assert that he did not visit the Parthian Christians,
after Peter had ceased to minister to them, on the mere ground of
absence of extant testimony to that effect. This is as probable a view
as ALFORD'S, that in the passage of AUGUSTINE, "to the Parthians," is to be altered by
conjectural emendation; and that the Epistle is addressed to the
churches at and around Ephesus, on the ground of the fatherly tone of
affectionate address in it, implying his personal ministry among his
readers. But his position, as probably the only surviving apostle,
accords very well with his addressing, in a Catholic Epistle, a cycle
of churches which he may not have specially ministered to in person,
with affectionate fatherly counsel, by virtue of his general apostolic
superintendence of all the churches.
TIME AND PLACE OF WRITING.--This Epistle seems to
have been written subsequently to his Gospel as it assumes the reader's
acquaintance with the Gospel facts and Christ's speeches, and also with
the special aspect of the incarnate Word, as God manifest in the
flesh
(1Ti 3:16),
set forth more fully in his Gospel. The tone of address, as a father
addressing his "little children" (the continually recurring
term,
1Jo 2:1, 12, 13, 18, 28;
3:7, 18; 4:4; 5:21),
accords with the view that this Epistle was written in John's old age,
perhaps about A.D. 90. In
1Jo 2:18,
"it is the last time," probably does not refer to any particular event
(as the destruction of Jerusalem, which was now many years past) but
refers to the nearness of the Lord's coming as proved by the rise of
Antichristian teachers, the mark of the last time. It was
the Spirit's purpose to keep the Church always expecting Christ as
ready to come at any moment. The whole Christian age is the last
time in the sense that no other dispensation is to arise till
Christ comes. Compare "these last days,"
Heb 1:2.
Ephesus may be conjectured to be the place whence it was
written. The controversial allusion to the germs of Gnostic heresy
accord with Asia Minor being the place, and the last part of the
apostolic age the time, of writing this Epistle.
CONTENTS.--The leading subject of the whole is,
fellowship with the Father and the Son
(1Jo 1:3).
Two principal divisions may be noted: (1)
1Jo 1:5-2:28:
the theme of this portion is stated at the outset, "God is light,
and in Him is no darkness at all"; consequently, in order to have
fellowship with Him, we must walk in light
(1Jo 1:7);
connected with which in the confession and subsequent
forgiveness of our sins through Christ's propitiation and
advocacy, without which forgiveness there could be no light or
fellowship with God: a farther step in thus walking in the light is,
positively keeping God's commandments, the sum of which is
love, as opposed to hatred, the acme of disobedience to
God's word: negatively, he exhorts them according to their several
stages of spiritual growth, children, fathers, young men, in
consonance with their privileges as forgiven, knowing the
Father, and having overcome the wicked one, not to love the
world, which is incompatible with the indwelling of the love of
the Father, and to be on their guard against the
Antichristian teachers already in the world, who were not of the
Church, but of the world, against whom the true defense is, that his
believing readers who have the anointing of God, should
continue to abide in the Son and in the Father. (2) The second
division
(1Jo 2:29-5:5)
discusses the theme with which it opens, He is righteous;
consequently (as in the first division), "every one that doeth
righteousness is born of Him." Sonship in us involves our
purifying ourselves as He is pure, even as we hope to see, and
therefore to be made like our Lord when He shall appear; in this
second, as in the first division, both a positive and a negative side
are presented of "doing righteousness as He is righteous," involving a
contrast between the children of God and the children of the devil.
Hatred marks the latter; love, the former: this love
gives assurance of acceptance with God for ourselves and our prayers,
accompanied as they are
(1Jo 3:23)
with obedience to His great commandment, to "believe on Jesus, and love
one another"; the seal
(1Jo 3:24)
of His dwelling in us and assuring our hearts, is the Spirit which He
hath given us. In contrast to this (as in the first division), he warns
against false spirits, the notes of which are, denial of Christ,
and adherence to the world. Sonship, or birth of God, is then
more fully described: its essential feature is unslavish, free love
to God, because God first loved us, and gave His Son to die for
us, and consequent love to the brethren, grounded on their
being sons of God also like ourselves, and so victory over the
world; this victory being gained only by the man who believes in
Jesus as the Son of God. (3) The conclusion establishes this
last central truth, on which rests our fellowship with God, Christ's
having come by the water of baptism, the blood of atonement,
and the witnessing Spirit, which is truth. As in the
opening he rested this cardinal truth on the apostles' witness of the
eye, the ear, and the touch, so now at the close he rests it on
God's witness, which is accepted by the believer, in contrast
with the unbeliever, who makes God a liar. Then follows his
closing statement of his reason for writing
(1Jo 5:13;
compare the corresponding
1Jo 1:4,
at the beginning), namely, that believers in Christ the Son of God
may know that they have (now already) eternal life (the
source of "joy,"
1Jo 1:4;
compare similarly his object in writing the Gospel,
Joh 20:31),
and so have confidence as to their prayers being answered
(corresponding to
1Jo 3:22
in the second part); for instance, their intercessions for a sinning
brother (unless his sin be a sin unto death). He closes with
a brief summing up of the instruction of the Epistle, the high dignity,
sanctity, and safety from evil of the children of God in contrast to
the sinful world, and a warning against idolatry, literal and
spiritual: "Keep yourselves from idols."
Though the Epistle is not directly polemical, the occasion which
suggested his writing was probably the rise of Antichristian teachers;
and, because he knew the spiritual character of the several
classes whom he addresses, children, youths, fathers, he feels
it necessary to write to confirm them in the faith and joyful
fellowship of the Father and Son, and to assure them of the reality of
the things they believe, that so they may have the full privileges of
believing.
STYLE.--His peculiarity is fondness for aphorism
and repetition. His tendency to repeat his own phrase, arises partly
from the affectionate, hortatory character of the Epistle; partly,
also, from its Hebraistic forms abounding in parallel clauses, as
distinguished from the Grecian and more logical style of Paul; also,
from his childlike simplicity of spirit, which, full of his one grand
theme, repeats, and dwells on it with fond delight and enthusiasm.
Moreover as ALFORD well says, the appearance of
uniformity is often produced by want of deep enough exegesis to
discover the real differences in passages which seem to express the
same. Contemplative, rather than argumentative, he dwells more on the
general, than on the particular, on the inner, than on the outer,
Christian life. Certain fundamental truths he recurs to again and
again, at one time enlarging on, and applying them, at another time
repeating them in their condensed simplicity. The thoughts do not march
onward by successive steps, as in the logical style of Paul, but rather
in circle drawn round one central thought which he reiterates, ever
reverting to it, and viewing it, now under its positive, now under its
negative, aspect. Many terms which in the Gospel are given as Christ's,
in the Epistle appear as the favorite expressions of John, naturally
adopted from the Lord. Thus the contrasted terms, "flesh" and "spirit,"
"light" and "darkness," "life" and "death," "abide in Him": fellowship
with the Father and Son, and with one another," is a favorite phrase
also, not found in the Gospel, but in Acts and Paul's Epistles. In him
appears the harmonious union of opposites, adapting him for his high
functions in the kingdom of God, contemplative repose of character, and
at the same time ardent zeal, combined with burning, all-absorbing
love: less adapted for active outward work, such as Paul's, than for
spiritual service. He handles Christian verities not as abstract
dogmas, but as living realities, personally enjoyed in fellowship with
God in Christ, and with the brethren. Simple, and at the same time
profound, his writing is in consonance with his spirit, unrhetorical
and undialectic, gentle, consolatory, and loving: the reflection of the
Spirit of Him on whose breast he lay at the last supper, and whose
beloved disciple he was. EWALD in ALFORD, speaking of the "unruffled and heavenly repose"
which characterizes this Epistle, says, "It appears to be the tone, not
so much of a father talking with his beloved children, as of a
glorified saint addressing mankind from a higher world. Never in any
writing has the doctrine of heavenly love--a love working in stillness,
ever unwearied, never exhausted--so thoroughly approved itself as in
this Epistle."
JOHN'S PLACE IN THE BUILDING UP OF THE CHURCH.--As
Peter founded and Paul propagated, so John completed the spiritual
building. As the Old Testament puts prominently forward the fear of
God, so John, the last writer of the New Testament, gives
prominence to the love of God. Yet, as the Old Testament is not
all limited to presenting the fear of God, but sets forth also His
love, so John, as a representative of the New Testament, while
breathing so continually the spirit of love, gives also the plainest
and most awful warnings against sin, in accordance with his original
character as Boanerges, "son of thunder." His mother was Salome, mother
of the sons of Zebedee, probably sister to Jesus' mother (compare
Joh 19:25,
"His mother's sister," with
Mt 27:56;
Mr 15:40),
so that he was cousin to our Lord; to his mother, under God, he may
have owed his first serious impressions. Expecting as she did the
Messianic kingdom in glory, as appears from her petition
(Mt 20:20-23),
she doubtless tried to fill his young and ardent mind with the same
hope. NEANDER distinguishes three leading
tendencies in the development of the Christian doctrine, the Pauline,
the Jacobean (between which the Petrine forms an intermediate link),
and the Johannean. John, in common with James, was less disposed to the
intellectual and dialectic cast of thought which distinguishes Paul. He
had not, like the apostle of the Gentiles, been brought to faith and
peace through severe conflict; but, like James, had reached his
Christian individuality through a quiet development: James, however,
had passed through a moulding in Judaism previously, which, under the
Spirit, caused him to present Christian truth in connection with the
law, in so far as the latter in its spirit, though not letter, is
permanent, and not abolished, but established under the Gospel. But
John, from the first, had drawn his whole spiritual development from
the personal view of Christ, the model man, and from intercourse with
Him. Hence, in his writings, everything turns on one simple contrast:
divine life in communion with Christ; death in separation from
Him, as appears from his characteristic phrases, "life, light,
truth; death, darkness, lie." "As James and Peter mark the gradual
transition from spiritualized Judaism to the independent development of
Christianity, and as Paul represents the independent development of
Christianity in opposition to the Jewish standpoint, so the
contemplative element of John reconciles the two, and forms the closing
point in the training of the apostolic Church" [NEANDER].
CHAPTER 1
1Jo 1:1-10.
THE
WRITER'S
AUTHORITY AS AN
EYEWITNESS TO THE
GOSPEL
FACTS,
HAVING
SEEN,
HEARD, AND
HANDLED
HIM
WHO
WAS FROM THE
BEGINNING:
HIS
OBJECT IN
WRITING:
HIS
MESSAGE.
IF
WE
WOULD
HAVE
FELLOWSHIP WITH
HIM,
WE
MUST
WALK IN
LIGHT, AS
HE
IS
LIGHT.
1. Instead of a formal, John adopts a virtual address (compare
1Jo 1:4).
To wish joy to the reader was the ancient customary address. The
sentence begun in
1Jo 1:1
is broken off by the parenthetic
1Jo 1:2,
and is resumed at
1Jo 1:3
with the repetition of some words from
1Jo 1:1.
That which was--not "began to be," but was essentially
(Greek, "een," not "egeneto") before He was
manifested
(1Jo 1:2);
answering to "Him that is from the beginning"
(1Jo 2:13);
so John's Gospel,
Joh 1:1,
"In the beginning was the Word."
Pr 8:23,
"I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the
earth was."
we--apostles.
heard . . . seen . . . looked upon
. . . handled--a series rising in gradation.
Seeing is a more convincing proof than hearing of;
handling, than even seeing. "Have heard
. . . have seen" (perfect tenses), as a possession
still abiding with us; but in Greek (not as English
Version "have," but simply) "looked upon" (not perfect tense, as of
a continuing thing, but aorist, past time) while Christ
the incarnate Word was still with us. "Seen," namely, His glory, as
revealed in the Transfiguration and in His miracles; and His passion
and death in a real body of flesh and blood. "Looked upon" as a
wondrous spectacle steadfastly, deeply, contemplatively; so the
Greek. Appropriate to John's contemplative character.
hands . . . handled--Thomas and the other disciples on
distinct occasions after the resurrection. John himself had leaned on
Jesus' breast at the last supper. Contrast the wisest of the heathen
feeling after (the same Greek as here; groping
after WITH THE HANDS") if haply they might
find God (see
Ac 17:27).
This proves against Socinians he is here speaking of the personal
incarnate Word, not of Christ's teaching from the beginning
of His official life.
of--"concerning"; following "heard." "Heard" is the verb most
applying to the purpose of the Epistle, namely the truth which John had
heard concerning the Word of life, that is, (Christ) the
Word who is the life. "Heard," namely, from Christ Himself,
including all Christ's teachings about Himself. Therefore he puts "of,"
or "concerning," before "the word of life," which is inapplicable to
any of the verbs except "heard"; also "heard" is the only one of the
verbs which he resumes at
1Jo 1:5.
2. the life--Jesus, "the Word of life."
was manifested--who had previously been "with the Father."
show--Translate as in
1Jo 1:3,
"declare" (compare
1Jo 1:5).
Declare is the general term; write is the particular
(1Jo 1:4).
that eternal life--Greek, "the life which is eternal." As
the Epistle begins, so it ends with "eternal life," which we shall ever
enjoy with, and in, Him who is "the life eternal."
which--Greek, "the which." the before-mentioned
(1Jo 1:1)
life which was with the Father "from the beginning" (compare
Joh 1:1).
This proves the distinctness of the First and Second Persons in the one
Godhead.
3. That which we have seen and heard--resumed from
1Jo 1:1,
wherein the sentence, being interrupted by
1Jo 1:2,
parenthesis, was left incomplete.
declare we unto you--Oldest manuscripts add also; unto you
also who have not seen or heard Him.
that ye also may have fellowship with us--that ye also
who have not seen, may have the fellowship with us which
we who have seen enjoy; what that fellowship consists in he proceeds to
state, "Our fellowship is with the Father and with His Son." Faith
realizes what we have not seen as spiritually visible; not till by
faith we too have seen, do we know all the excellency of the true
Solomon. He Himself is ours; He in us and we in Him. We are "partakers
of the divine nature." We know God only by having fellowship with Him;
He may thus be known, but not comprehended. The
repetition of "with" before the "Son," distinguishes the
persons, while the fellowship or communion with
both Father and Son, implies their unity. It is not added
"and with the Holy Ghost"; for it is by the Holy Ghost or Spirit
of the Father and Son in us, that we are enabled to have fellowship
with the Father and Son (compare
1Jo 3:24).
Believers enjoy the fellowship OF, but not WITH, the Holy Ghost. "Through Christ God closes up the
chasm that separated Him from the human race, and imparts Himself to
them in the communion of the divine life" [NEANDER].
4. these things--and none other, namely, this whole Epistle.
write we unto you--Some oldest manuscripts omit "unto you," and
emphasize "we." Thus the antithesis is between "we" (apostles and
eye-witnesses) and "your." We write thus that your joy
may be full. Other oldest manuscripts and versions read "OUR joy," namely, that our joy may be filled full
by bringing you also into fellowship with the Father and Son.
(Compare
Joh 4:36,
end;
Php 2:2,
"Fulfil ye my joy,"
Php 2:16; 4:1;
2Jo 8).
It is possible that "your" may be a correction of transcribers to make
this verse harmonize with
Joh 15:11; 16:24;
however, as John often repeats favorite phrases, he may do so here, so
"your" may be from himself. So
2Jo 12,
"your" in oldest manuscripts. The authority of manuscripts and versions
on both sides here is almost evenly balanced. Christ Himself is the
source, object, and center of His people's joy (compare
1Jo 1:3,
end); it is in fellowship with Him that we have joy, the
fruit of faith.
5. First division of the body of the Epistle (compare
Introduction).
declare--Greek, "announce"; report in turn; a different
Greek word from
1Jo 1:3.
As the Son announced the message heard from the Father as His apostle,
so the Son's apostles announce what they have heard from the Son. John
nowhere uses the term "Gospel"; but the witness or testimony,
the word, the truth, and here the message.
God is light--What light is in the natural world, that God, the
source of even material light, is in the spiritual, the fountain of
wisdom, purity, beauty, joy, and glory. As all material life and growth
depends on light, so all spiritual life and growth depends on
GOD. As God here, so Christ, in
1Jo 2:8,
is called "the true light."
no darkness at all--strong negation; Greek, "No, not even
one speck of darkness"; no ignorance, error, untruthfulness, sin, or
death. John heard this from Christ, not only in express words, but in
His acted words, namely, His is whole manifestation in the flesh as
"the brightness of the Father's glory." Christ Himself was the
embodiment of "the message," representing fully in all His sayings,
doings, and sufferings, Him who is LIGHT.
6. say--profess.
have fellowship with him--
(1Jo 1:3).
The essence of the Christian life.
walk--in inward and outward action, whithersoever we turn
ourselves [BENGEL].
in darkness--Greek, "in the darkness"; opposed to
"the light" (compare
1Jo 2:8, 11).
lie--
(1Jo 2:4).
do not--in practice, whatever we say.
the truth--
(Eph 4:21;
Joh 3:21).
7. Compare
Eph 5:8, 11-14.
"WE WALK"; "God is (essentially in His very
nature as 'the light,'
1Jo 1:5)
in the light." WALKING in the light, the
element in which God Himself is, constitutes the test of fellowship
with Him. Christ, like us, walked in the light
(1Jo 2:6).
ALFORD notices, Walking in the light as He is in
the light, is no mere imitation of God, but an identity in the
essential element of our daily walk with the essential element of
God's eternal being.
we have fellowship one with another--and of course with
God (to be understood from
1Jo 1:6).
Without having fellowship with God there can be no true and Christian
fellowship one with another (compare
1Jo 1:3).
and--as the result of "walking in the light, as He is in the
light."
the blood of Jesus . . . cleanseth us from all
sin--daily contracted through the sinful weakness of the flesh, and
the power of Satan and the world. He is speaking not of justification
through His blood once for all, but of the present
sanctification ("cleanseth" is present tense) which the
believer, walking in the light and having fellowship with God
and the saints, enjoys as His privilege. Compare
Joh 13:10,
Greek, "He that has been bathed, needeth not save to
wash his feet, but is clean every whit." Compare
1Jo 1:9,
"cleanse us from all unrighteousness," a further step besides
"forgiving us our sins." Christ's blood is the cleansing mean,
whereby gradually, being already justified and in fellowship with God,
we become clean from all sin which would mar our fellowship with
God. Faith applies the cleansing, purifying blood. Some oldest
manuscripts omit "Christ"; others retain it.
8. The confession of sins is a necessary consequence of
"walking in the light"
(1Jo 1:7).
"If thou shalt confess thyself a sinner, the truth is in thee;
for the truth is itself light. Not yet has thy life
become perfectly light, as sins are still in thee, but yet thou hast
already begun to be illuminated, because there is in thee confession of
sins" [AUGUSTINE].
that we have no sin--"HAVE," not "have
had," must refer not to the past sinful life while unconverted,
but to the present state wherein believers have sin even
still. Observe, "sin" is in the singular; "(confess our) sins"
(1Jo 1:9)
in the plural. Sin refers to the corruption of the old
man still present in us, and the stain created by the actual
sins flowing from that old nature in us. To confess our need of
cleansing from present sin is essential to "walking in the
light"; so far is the presence of some sin incompatible with our in
the main "walking in light." But the believer hates, confesses, and
longs to be delivered from all sin, which is darkness. "They who
defend their sins, will see in the great day whether their sins can
defend them."
deceive ourselves--We cannot deceive God; we only make ourselves
to err from the right path.
the truth--
(1Jo 2:4).
True faith. "The truth respecting God's holiness and our sinfulness,
which is the very first spark of light in us, has no place in us"
[ALFORD].
9. confess--with the lips, speaking from a contrite heart;
involving also confession to our fellow men of offenses committed
against them.
he--God.
faithful--to His own promises; "true" to His word.
just--Not merely the mercy, but the justice or
righteousness of God is set forth in the redemption of the
penitent believer in Christ. God's promises of mercy, to which He is
faithful, are in accordance with His justice.
to--Greek, "in order that." His forgiving us our sins
and cleansing us, &c., is in furtherance of the ends of His
eternal faithfulness and justice.
forgive--remitting the guilt.
cleanse--purify from all filthiness, so that henceforth we more
and more become free from the presence of sin through the Spirit of
sanctification (compare
Heb 9:14;
and above, see on
1Jo 1:7).
unrighteousness--offensive to Him who "is just" or
righteous; called "sin,"
1Jo 1:7,
because "sin is the transgression of the law," and the law is the
expression of God's righteousness, so that sin is
unrighteousness.
10. Parallel to
1Jo 1:8.
we have not sinned--referring to the commission of actual
sins, even after regeneration and conversion; whereas in
1Jo 1:8,
"we have no sin," refers to the present GUILT
remaining (until cleansed) from the actual sins committed, and
to the SIN of our corrupt old nature still
adhering to us. The perfect "have . . . sinned" brings down
the commission of sins to the present time, not merely sins committed
before, but since, conversion.
we make him a liar--a gradation;
1Jo 1:6,
"we lie";
1Jo 1:8,
"we deceive ourselves"; worst of all, "we make Him a liar," by denying
His word that all men are sinners (compare
1Jo 5:10).
his word is not in us--"His word," which is "the truth"
(1Jo 1:8),
accuses us truly; by denying it we drive it from our hearts (compare
Joh 5:38).
Our rejection of "His word" in respect to our being sinners, implies as
the consequence our rejection of His word and will revealed in the law
and Gospel as a whole; for these throughout rest on the fact
that we have sinned, and have sin.
CHAPTER 2
1Jo 2:1-29.
THE
ADVOCACY OF
CHRIST
IS
OUR
ANTIDOTE TO
SIN
WHILE
WALKING IN THE
LIGHT; FOR TO
KNOW
GOD,
WE
MUST
KEEP
HIS
COMMANDMENTS AND
LOVE THE
BRETHREN, AND
NOT
LOVE THE
WORLD,
NOR
GIVE
HEED TO
ANTICHRISTS, AGAINST
WHOM
OUR
SAFETY
IS THROUGH THE
INWARD
ANOINTING OF
GOD TO
ABIDE IN
GOD:
SO AT
CHRIST'S
COMING
WE
SHALL
NOT
BE
ASHAMED.
1.
(1Jo 5:18.)
My little children--The diminutive expresses the tender
affection of an aged pastor and spiritual father. My own dear
children, that is, sons and daughters (see on
1Jo 2:12).
these things--
(1Jo 1:6-10).
My purpose in writing what I have just written is not that you should
abuse them as giving a license to sin but, on the contrary, "in order
that ye may not sin at all" (the Greek aorist, implying the
absence not only of the habit, but of single acts of sin [ALFORD]). In order to "walk in the light"
(1Jo 1:5, 7),
the first step is confession of sin
(1Jo 1:9),
the next
(1Jo 2:1)
is that we should forsake all sin. The divine purpose has for
its aim, either to prevent the commission of, or to destroy sin [BENGEL].
And, &c.--connected with the former; Furthermore, "if any
man sin," let him, while loathing and condemning it, not fear to go at
once to God, the Judge, confessing it, for "we have an Advocate with
Him." He is speaking of a BELIEVER'S
occasional sins of infirmity through Satan's fraud and malice.
The use of "we" immediately afterwards implies that we all are
liable to this, though not necessarily constrained to sin.
we have an advocate--Advocacy is God's family blessing; other
blessings He grants to good and bad alike, but justification,
sanctification, continued intercession, and peace, He grants to His
children alone.
advocate--Greek, "paraclete," the same term as is
applied to the Holy Ghost, as the "other Comforter"; showing the unity
of the Second and Third Persons of the Trinity. Christ is the
Intercessor for us above; and, in His absence, here below the
Holy Ghost is the other Intercessor in us. Christ's
advocacy is inseparable from the Holy Spirit's comfort
and working in us, as the spirit of intercessory prayer.
righteous--As our "advocate," Christ is not a mere suppliant
petitioner. He pleads for us on the ground of justice, or
righteousness, as well as mercy. Though He can say nothing good
of us, He can say much for us. It is His
righteousness, or obedience to the law, and endurance of its
full penalty for us, on which He grounds His claim for our acquittal.
The sense therefore is, "in that He is righteous"; in contrast
to our sin ("if any man sin"). The Father, by raising
Him from the dead, and setting Him at His own right, has once for all
accepted Christ's claim for us. Therefore the accuser's charges against
God's children are vain. "The righteousness of Christ stands on our
side; for God's righteousness is, in Jesus Christ, ours" [LUTHER].
2. And he--Greek, "And Himself." He is our
all-prevailing Advocate, because He is Himself "the
propitiation"; abstract, as in
1Co 1:30:
He is to us all that is needed for propitiation "in behalf of
our sins"; the propitiatory sacrifice, provided by the Father's
love, removing the estrangement, and appeasing the righteous wrath, on
God's part, against the sinner. "There is no incongruity that a father
should be offended with that son whom he loveth, and at that
time offended with him when he loveth him" [BISHOP PEARSON]. The only other
place in the New Testament where Greek "propitiation" occurs, is
1Jo 4:10;
it answers in the Septuagint to Hebrew, "caphar,"
to effect an atonement or reconciliation with God; and in
Eze 44:29,
to the sin offering. In
Ro 3:25,
Greek, it is "propitiatory," that is, the mercy seat, or lid of
the ark whereon God, represented by the Shekinah glory above it, met
His people, represented by the high priest who sprinkled the blood of
the sacrifice on it.
and--Greek, "yet."
ours--believers: not Jews, in contrast to Gentiles; for
he is not writing to Jews
(1Jo 5:21).
also for the sins of the whole world--Christ's "advocacy" is
limited to believers
(1Jo 2:1;
1Jo 1:7):
His propitiation extends as widely as sin extends: see on
2Pe 2:1,
"denying the Lord that bought them." "The whole world" cannot be
restricted to the believing portion of the world (compare
1Jo 4:14;
and "the whole world,"
1Jo 5:19).
"Thou, too, art part of the world, so that thine heart cannot deceive
itself and think, The Lord died for Peter and Paul, but not for me"
[LUTHER].
3. hereby--Greek, "in this." "It is herein," and
herein only, that we know (present tense) that we have knowledge of
(perfect tense, once-for-all obtained and continuing knowledge
of) Him"
(1Jo 2:4, 13, 14).
Tokens whereby to discern grace are frequently given in this Epistle.
The Gnostics, by the Spirit's prescient forewarning, are refuted, who
boasted of knowledge, but set aside obedience. "Know
Him," namely, as "the righteous"
(1Jo 2:1, 29);
our "Advocate and Intercessor."
keep--John's favorite word, instead of "do," literally, "watch,"
"guard," and "keep safe" as a precious thing; observing so as to keep.
So Christ Himself. Not faultless conformity, but hearty acceptance of,
and willing subjection to, God's whole revealed will, is meant.
commandments--injunctions of faith, love, and obedience.
John never uses "the law" to express the rule of Christian obedience:
he uses it as the Mosaic law.
4. I know--Greek, "I have knowledge of (perfect)
Him." Compare with this verse
1Jo 1:8.
5. Not merely repeating the proposition,
1Jo 2:3,
or asserting the merely opposite alternative to
1Jo 2:4,
but expanding the "know Him" of
1Jo 2:3,
into "in Him, verily (not as a matter of vain boasting) is the love of
(that is towards) God perfected," and "we are in Him." Love here
answers to knowledge in
1Jo 2:3.
In proportion as we love God, in that same proportion we know
Him, and vice versa, until our love and knowledge shall attain
their full maturity of perfection.
his word--His word is one (see on
1Jo 1:5),
and comprises His "commandments," which are many
(1Jo 2:3).
hereby--in our progressing towards this ideal of perfected love
and obedience. There is a gradation:
1Jo 2:3,
"know Him";
1Jo 2:5,
"we are in Him";
1Jo 2:6,
"abideth in Him"; respectively, knowledge, fellowship,
abiding constancy. [BENGEL].
6. abideth--implying a condition lasting, without intermission,
and without end.
He that saith . . . ought--so that his deeds may be
consistent with his words.
even as he--Believers readily supply the name, their hearts
being full of Him (compare
Joh 20:15).
"Even as He walked" when on earth, especially in respect to
love. John delights in referring to Christ as the model man,
with the words, "Even as He," &c. "It is not Christ's walking on the
sea, but His ordinary walk, that we are called on to imitate" [LUTHER].
7. Brethren--The oldest manuscripts and versions read instead,
"Beloved," appropriate to the subject here, love.
no new commandment--namely, love, the main principle of
walking as Christ walked
(1Jo 2:6),
and that commandment, of which one exemplification is presently given,
1Jo 2:9, 10,
the love of brethren.
ye had from the beginning--from the time that ye first heard the
Gospel word preached.
8. a new commandment--It was "old," in that Christians as
such had heard it from the first; but "new" (Greek,
"kaine," not "nea": new and different from the
old legal precept) in that it was first clearly
promulgated with Christianity; though the inner spirit of the
law was love even to enemies, yet it was enveloped in some
bitter precepts which caused it to be temporarily almost unrecognized,
till the Gospel came. Christianity first put love to brethren on
the new and highest MOTIVE, instinctive
love to Him who first loved us, constraining us to love all, even
enemies, thereby walking in the steps of Him who loved us when enemies.
So Jesus calls it "new,"
Joh 13:34, 35,
"Love one another as I have loved you" (the new motive);
Joh 15:12.
which thing is true in him and in you--"In Christ all
things are always true, and were so from the beginning; but in
Christ and in us conjointly the commandment [the love of
brethren] is then true when we acknowledge the truth which is
in Him, and have the same flourishing in us" [BENGEL]. ALFORD explains, "Which
thing (the fact that the commandment is a new one) is true in
Him and in you because the darkness is passing away, and the
true light is now shining; that is, the commandment is a new
one, and this is true both in the case of Christ and in the case of
you; because in you the darkness is passing away, and in
Him the true light is shining; therefore, on both accounts, the
command is a new one: new as regards you, because you are newly
come from darkness into light; new as regards Him, because He uttered
it when He came into the world to lighten every man, and began that
shining which even now continues." I prefer, as BENGEL, to explain, The new commandment finds its
truth in its practical realization in the walk of
Christians in union with Christ. Compare the use of "verily,"
1Jo 2:5.
Joh 4:42,
"indeed";
Joh 6:55.
The repetition of "in" before "you," "in Him and in you," not "in Him
and you" implies that the love commandment finds its realization
separately: first it did so "in Him," and then it does so
"in us," in so far as we now "also walk even as He walked"; and yet it
finds its realization also conjointly, by the two being united
in one sentence, even as it is by virtue of the love commandment having
been first fulfilled in Him, that it is also now fulfilled in
us, through His Spirit in us: compare a similar case,
Joh 20:17,
"My Father and your Father"; by virtue of His being
"My Father," He is also your Father.
darkness is past--rather, as in
1Jo 2:17,
"is passing away." It shall not be wholly "past" until "the Sun of
righteousness" shall arise visibly; "the light is now shining"
already, though but partially until the day bursts forth.
9-11. There is no mean between light and darkness, love
and hatred, life and death, God and the world:
wherever spiritual life is, however weak, there darkness
and death no longer reign, and love supplants
hatred; and
Lu 9:50
holds good: wherever life is not, there death, darkness,
the flesh, the world, and hatred, however glossed over
and hidden from man's observation, prevail; and
Lu 11:23
holds good. "Where love is not, there hatred is; for the heart cannot
remain a void" [BENGEL].
in the light--as his proper element.
his brother--his neighbor, and especially those of the Christian
brotherhood. The very title "brother" is a reason why love should be
exercised.
even until now--notwithstanding that "the true light already has
begun to shine"
(1Jo 2:8).
10. Abiding in love is abiding in the
light; for the Gospel light not only illumines the understanding,
but warms the heart into love.
none occasion of stumbling--In contrast to, "He that hateth his
brother is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, and knoweth not
whither he goeth, because that darkness hath blinded his eyes." "In him
who loves there is neither blindness nor occasion of stumbling
[to himself]: in him who does not love, there is both blindness
and occasion of stumbling. He who hates his brother, is both a
stumbling-block to himself, and stumbles against himself and everything
within and without; he who loves has an unimpeded path" [BENGEL]. John has in mind Jesus' words,
Joh 11:9, 10.
ALFORD well says, "The light and the darkness are
within ourselves; admitted into us by the eye, whose singleness fills
the whole body with light."
11. is in darkness . . . walketh--"is" marks his
continuing STATE: he has never come out of "the darkness" (so
Greek); "walketh" marks his OUTWARD WALK
and acts.
whither--Greek, "where"; including not only the
destination to which, but the way whereby.
hath blinded--rather, as Greek aorist, "blinded" of old.
Darkness not only surrounds, but blinds him, and that a blindness of
long standing.
12. little children--Greek, "little sons," or
"dear sons and daughters"; not the same Greek as in
1Jo 2:13,
"little children," "infants" (in age and standing). He calls
ALL to whom he writes, "little sons"
(1Jo 2:1,
Greek;
1Jo 2:28; 3:18; 4:4; 5:21);
but only in
1Jo 2:13, 18
he uses the term "little children," or "infants." Our Lord, whose
Spirit John so deeply drank into, used to His disciples
(Joh 13:33)
the term "little sons," or dear sons and daughters; but in
Joh 21:5,
"little children." It is an undesigned coincidence with the Epistle
here, that in John's Gospel somewhat similarly the classification,
"lambs, sheep, sheep," occurs.
are forgiven--"have been, and are forgiven you":
ALL God's sons and daughters alike enjoy
this privilege.
13, 14. All three classes are first addressed in the present. "I
write"; then in the past (aorist) tense, "I wrote" (not "I have
written"; moreover, in the oldest manuscripts and versions, in the end
of
1Jo 2:13,
it is past, "I wrote," not as English Version, "I write"). Two
classes, "fathers" and "young men," are addressed with the same words
each time (except that the address to the young men has an
addition expressing the source and means of their victory); but the
"little sons" and "little children" are differently addressed.
have known--and do know: so the Greek perfect means. The
"I wrote" refers not to a former Epistle, but to this Epistle. It was
an idiom to put the past tense, regarding the time from the
reader's point of view; when he should receive the Epistle the
writing would be past. When he uses "I write," he speaks from
his own point of view.
him that is from the beginning--Christ: "that which was
from the beginning."
overcome--The fathers, appropriately to their age, are
characterized by knowledge. The young men, appropriately
to theirs, by activity in conflict. The fathers, too,
have conquered; but now their active service is past, and they
and the children alike are characterized by knowing (the
fathers know Christ, "Him that was from the beginning";
the children know the Father). The first thing that the
little children realize is that God is their Father;
answering in the parallel clause to "little sons . . . your
sins are forgiven you for His name's sake," the universal first
privilege of all those really-dear sons of God. Thus
this latter clause includes all, whereas the former clause
refers to those more especially who are in the first stage of
spiritual life, "little children." Of course, these can only know
the Father as theirs through the Son
(Mt 11:27).
It is beautiful to see how the fathers are characterized as
reverting back to the first great truths of spiritual childhood, and
the sum and ripest fruit of advanced experience, the knowledge of
Him that was from the beginning (twice repeated,
1Jo 2:13, 14).
Many of them had probably known Jesus in person, as well as by
faith.
14. young men . . . strong--made so out
of natural weakness, hence enabled to overcome "the
strong man armed" through Him that is "stronger." Faith is the victory
that overcomes the world. This term "overcome" is peculiarly John's,
adopted from his loved Lord. It occurs sixteen times in the Apocalypse,
six times in the First Epistle, only thrice in the rest of the New
Testament. In order to overcome the world on the ground, and in the
strength, of the blood of the Saviour, we must be willing, like Christ,
to part with whatever of the world belongs to us: whence immediately
after "ye have overcome the wicked one (the prince of the world)," it
is added, "Love not the world, neither the things . . . in
the world."
and, &c.--the secret of the young men's strength: the
Gospel word, clothed with living power by the Spirit who
abideth permanently in them; this is "the sword of the Spirit"
wielded in prayerful waiting on God. Contrast the mere physical
strength of young men,
Isa 40:30, 31.
Oral teaching prepared these youths for the profitable use of
the word when written. "Antichrist cannot endanger you
(1Jo 2:18),
nor Satan tear from you the word of God."
the wicked one--who, as "prince of this world," enthrals "the
world"
(1Jo 2:15-17; 5:19,
Greek, "the wicked one"), especially the young. Christ came to
destroy this "prince of the world." Believers achieve the first grand
conquest over him when they pass from darkness to light, but afterwards
they need to maintain a continual keeping of themselves from his
assaults, looking to God by whom alone they are kept safe.
BENGEL thinks John refers specially to the
remarkable constancy exhibited by youths in Domitian's persecution.
Also to the young man whom John, after his return from Patmos, led with
gentle, loving persuasion to repentance. This youth had been commended
to the overseers of the Church by John, in one of his tours of
superintendency, as a promising disciple; he had been, therefore,
carefully watched up to baptism. But afterwards relying too much on
baptismal grace, he joined evil associates, and fell from step to step
down, till he became a captain of robbers. When John, some years after,
revisited that Church and heard of the youth's sad fall, he hastened to
the retreat of the robbers, suffered himself to be seized and taken
into the captain's presence. The youth, stung by conscience and the
remembrance of former years, fled away from the venerable apostle. Full
of love the aged father ran after him, called on him to take courage,
and announced to him forgiveness of his sins in the name of Christ. The
youth was recovered to the paths of Christianity, and was the means of
inducing many of his bad associates to repent and believe [CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA, Who Is the
Rich Man Who Shall Be Saved? 4.2; EUSEBIUS,
Ecclesiastical History, 3.20; CHRYSOSTOM,
First Exhortation to Theodore, 11].
15. Love not the world--that lieth in the wicked one
(1Jo 5:19),
whom ye young men have overcome. Having once for all, through
faith, overcome the world
(1Jo 4:4; 5:4),
carry forward the conquest by not loving it. "The world" here means
"man, and man's world" [ALFORD], in his and its
state as fallen from God. "God loved [with the love of
compassion] the world," and we should feel the same kind of love
for the fallen world; but we are not to love the world
with congeniality and sympathy in its alienation from
God; we cannot have this latter kind of love for the God-estranged
world, and yet have also "the love of the Father in" us.
neither--Greek, "nor yet." A man might deny in general
that he loved the world, while keenly following some one of
THE THINGS IN IT: its riches, honors, or
pleasures; this clause prevents him escaping from conviction.
any man--therefore the warning, though primarily addressed to
the young, applies to all.
love of--that is, towards "the Father." The two, God and
the (sinful) world, are so opposed, that both cannot be congenially
loved at once.
16. all that is in the world--can be classed under one or other
of the three; the world contains these and no more.
lust of the flesh--that is, the lust which has its seat and
source in our lower animal nature. Satan tried this temptation the
first on Christ:
Lu 4:3,
"Command this stone that it be made bread." Youth is especially
liable to fleshly lusts.
lust of the eyes--the avenue through which outward things of the
world, riches, pomp, and beauty, inflame us. Satan tried this
temptation on Christ when he showed Him the kingdoms of the world in a
moment. By the lust of the eyes David
(2Sa 11:2)
and Achan fell
(Jos 7:21).
Compare David's prayer,
Ps 119:37;
Job's resolve,
Ps 31:1;
Mt 5:28.
The only good of worldly riches to the possessor is the beholding them
with the eyes. Compare
Lu 14:18,
"I must go and SEE it."
pride of life--literally, "arrogant assumption": vainglorious
display. Pride was Satan's sin whereby he fell and forms the
link between the two foes of man, the world (answering to "the
lust of the eyes") and the devil (as "the lust of the flesh" is
the third foe). Satan tried this temptation on Christ in setting Him on
the temple pinnacle that, in spiritual pride and
presumption, on the ground of His Father's care, He should cast
Himself down. The same three foes appear in the three classes of soil
on which the divine seed falls: the wayside hearers, the devil;
the thorns, the world; the rocky undersoil, the flesh
(Mt 13:18-23;
Mr 4:3-8).
The world's awful antitrinity, the "lust of the flesh, the lust
of the eyes, and the pride of life," similarly is presented in Satan's
temptation of Eve: "When she saw that the tree was good for
food, pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to
make one wise,"
Ge 3:6
(one manifestation of "the pride of life," the desire to know above
what God has revealed,
Col 2:8,
the pride of unsanctified knowledge).
of--does not spring from "the Father" (used in relation
to the preceding "little children,"
1Jo 2:12,
or "little sons"). He who is born of God alone turns to
God; he who is of the world turns to the world; the sources of love to
God and love to the world, are irreconcilably distinct.
17. the world--with all who are of the world worldly.
passeth away--Greek, "is passing away" even now.
the lust thereof--in its threefold manifestation
(1Jo 2:16).
he that doeth the will of God--not his own fleshly will,
or the will of the world, but that of God
(1Jo 2:3, 6),
especially in respect to love.
abideth for ever--"even as God also abideth for ever" (with whom
the godly is one; compare
Ps 55:19,
"God, even He that abideth of old): a true comment, which
CYPRIAN and LUCIFER have
added to the text without support of Greek manuscripts.
In contrast to the three passing lusts of the world, the doer of
God's will has three abiding goods, "riches, honor, and life"
(Pr 22:4).
18. Little children--same Greek as
1Jo 2:13;
children in age. After the fathers and young men
were gone, "the last time" with its "many Antichrists" was about to
come suddenly on the children. "In this last hour we all
even still live" [BENGEL]. Each successive age
has had in it some of the signs of "the last time" which precedes
Christ's coming, in order to keep the Church in continual waiting for
the Lord. The connection with
1Jo 2:15-17
is: There are coming those seducers who are of the world
(1Jo 4:5),
and would tempt you to go out from us
(1Jo 2:19)
and deny Christ
(1Jo 2:22).
as ye have heard--from the apostles, preachers of the Gospel
(for example,
2Th 2:3-10;
and in the region of Ephesus,
Ac 20:29, 30).
shall come--Greek, "cometh," namely, out of his own
place. Antichrist is interpreted in two ways: a false Christ
(Mt 24:5, 24),
literally, "instead of Christ"; or an adversary of
Christ, literally, "against Christ." As John never uses
pseudo-Christ, or "false Christ," for Antichrist, it is
plain he means an adversary of Christ, claiming to himself what
belongs to Christ, and wishing to substitute himself for Christ as the
supreme object of worship. He denies the Son, not merely, like
the pope, acts in the name of the Son,
2Th 2:4,
"Who opposeth himself (Greek, "
ANTI-keimenos") [to] all that is called
God," decides this. For God's great truth, "God is man," he would
substitute his own lie, "man is God" [TRENCH].
are there--Greek, "there have begun to be"; there have
arisen. These "many Antichrists" answer to "the spirit of lawlessness
(Greek) doth already work." The Antichristian principle appeared
then, as now, in evil men and evil teachings and writings; but still
"THE Antichrist" means a hostile person,
even as "THE Christ" is a personal Saviour. As
"cometh" is used of Christ, so here of Antichrist, the
embodiment in his own person of all the Antichristian features and
spirit of those "many Antichrists" which have been, and are, his
forerunners. John uses the singular of him. No other New Testament
writer uses the term. He probably answers to "the little horn having
the eyes of a man, and speaking great things"
(Da 7:8, 20);
"the man of sin, son of perdition"
(2Th 2:3);
"the beast ascending out of the bottomless pit"
(Re 11:7; 17:8),
or rather, "the false prophet," the same as "the second beast coming up
out of the earth"
(Re 13:11-18; 16:13).
19. out from us--from our Christian communion. Not necessarily a
formal secession or going out: thus Rome has spiritually gone
out, though formally still of the Christian Church.
not of us--by spiritual fellowship
(1Jo 1:3).
"They are like bad humors in the body of Christ, the Church: when they
are vomited out, then the body is relieved; the body of Christ is now
still under treatment, and has not yet attained the perfect soundness
which it shall have only at the resurrection" [AUGUSTINE, Ten Homilies on the First Epistle of
John, Homily 3.4].
they would . . . have continued--implying the
indefectibility of grace in the elect. "Where God's call is effectual,
there will be sure perseverance" [CALVIN]. Still,
it is no fatal necessity, but a "voluntary necessity" [DIDYMUS], which causes men to remain, or else go from the
body of Christ. "We are either among the members, or else among the bad
humors. It is of his own will that each is either an Antichrist, or in
Christ" [AUGUSTINE]. Still God's actings in
eternal election harmonize in a way inexplicable to us, with
man's free agency and responsibility. It is men's own evil will that
chooses the way to hell; it is God's free and sovereign grace that
draws any to Himself and to heaven. To God the latter shall ascribe
wholly their salvation from first to last: the former shall reproach
themselves alone, and not God's decree, with their condemnation
(1Jo 3:9; 5:18).
that they were not all of us--This translation would imply
that some of the Antichrists are of us! Translate, therefore,
"that all (who are for a time among us) are not of us." Compare
1Co 11:19,
"There must be heresies among you, that they which are approved may be
made manifest among you." For "were" some of the oldest manuscripts
read "are." Such occasions test who are, and who are not, the Lord's
people.
20. But--Greek, "And." He here states the means which
they as believers have wherewith to withstand. Antichrists
(1Jo 2:18),
namely, the chrism (so the Greek: a play upon similar
sounds), or "anointing unguent," namely, the Holy Spirit (more plainly
mentioned further on, as in John's style,
1Jo 3:24; 4:13; 5:6),
which they ("ye" is emphatical in contrast to those apostates,
1Jo 2:19)
have "from the Holy One, Christ"
(Joh 1:33; 3:34; 15:26; 16:14):
"the righteous"
(1Jo 2:1),
"pure"
(1Jo 3:3),
"the Holy One"
(Ac 3:14)
"of God";
Mr 1:24.
Those anointed of God in Christ alone can resist those anointed
with the spirit of Satan, Antichrists, who would sever them from
the Father and from the Son. Believers have the anointing Spirit from
the Father also, as well as from the Son; even as the Son is
anointed therewith by the Father. Hence the Spirit is the token that we
are in the Father and in the Son; without it a man is none of Christ.
The material unguent of costliest ingredients, poured on the head of
priests and kings, typified this spiritual unguent, derived from
Christ, the Head, to us, His members. We can have no share in Him as
Jesus, except we become truly Christians, and so be in
Him as Christ, anointed with that unction from the Holy One. The
Spirit poured on Christ, the Head, is by Him diffused through all the
members. "It appears that we all are the body of Christ, because
we all are anointed: and we all in Him are both Christ's and
Christ, because in some measure the whole Christ is Head
and body."
and--therefore.
ye know all things--needful for acting aright against
Antichrist's seductions, and for Christian life and godliness. In the
same measure as one hath the Spirit, in that measure (no more
and no less) he knows all these things.
21. but because ye know it, and that, &c.--Ye not only
know what is the truth (concerning the Son and the Father,
1Jo 2:13),
but also are able to detect a lie as a thing opposed to the truth. For
right (a straight line) is the index of itself and of what is crooked
[ESTIUS]. The Greek is susceptible of
ALFORD'S translation, "Because ye know it, and
because no lie is of the truth" (literally, "every lie is
excluded from being of the truth"). I therefore wrote (in this Epistle)
to point out what the lie is, and who the liars are.
22. a liar--Greek, "Who is the liar?" namely, guilty of
the lie just mentioned
(1Jo 2:21).
that Jesus is the Christ--the grand central truth.
He is Antichrist--Greek, "the Antichrist"; not
however here personal, but in the abstract; the ideal of
Antichrist is "he that denieth the Father and the Son." To deny the
latter is virtually to deny the former. Again, the truth as to the Son
must be held in its integrity; to deny that Jesus is the Christ, or
that He is the Son of God, or that He came in the flesh, invalidates
the whole
(Mt 11:27).
23. Greek, "Every one who denieth the Son, hath not the
Father either"
(1Jo 4:2, 3):
"inasmuch as God hath given Himself to us wholly to be enjoyed in
Christ" [CALVIN].
he--that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.
These words ought not to be in italics, as though they were not in the
original: for the oldest Greek manuscripts have them.
hath--namely, in his abiding possession as his "portion"; by
living personal "fellowship."
acknowledgeth--by open confession of Christ.
24. Let that--truth respecting the Father and the Son, regarded
as a seed not merely dropped in, but having taken root
(1Jo 3:9).
ye--in the Greek standing emphatically at the beginning
of the sentence. YE, therefore, acknowledge the Son, and so
shall ye have the Father also
(1Jo 2:23).
from the beginning--from the time of your first hearing the
Gospel.
remain--Translate as before, "abide."
ye also--in your turn, as distinguished from "that which ye have
heard," the seed abiding in you. Compare
1Jo 2:27,
"the anointing abideth in you . . . ye shall abide
in Him." Having taken into us the living seed of the truth
concerning the Father and the Son, we become transformed into the
likeness of Him whose seed we have taken into us.
25. this is the promise--Eternal life shall be the
permanent consummation of thus abiding in the Son and in the
Father
(1Jo 2:24).
he--Greek, "Himself," Christ, "the Son" (compare
1Jo 1:1).
promised--
(Joh 3:15, 36;
6:40, 47, 57; 17:2, 3).
26. These things--
(1Jo 2:18-25).
have I written--resumed from
1Jo 2:21
and 1Jo 2:14.
seduce you--that is, are trying to seduce or lead you into
error.
27. But--Greek, "And you (contrasting the believing
readers with the seducers; the words 'and you' stand prominent,
the construction of the sentence following being altered, and no verb
agreeing with 'and you' until 'need not') . . . the
anointing," &c. (resumed from
1Jo 2:20).
received of him--
(Joh 1:16).
So we "are unto God a sweet savor of Christ."
abideth in you--He tacitly thus admonishes them to say, when
tempted by seducers, "The anointing abideth in us; we do not need a
teacher [for we have the Holy Spirit as our teacher,
Jer 31:34;
Joh 6:45; 16:13];
it teaches us the truth; in that teaching we will abide"
[BENGEL].
and--and therefore. God is sufficient for them who are taught of
Him; they are independent of all others, though, of course, not
declining the Christian counsel of faithful ministers. "Mutual
communication is not set aside, but approved of, in the case of those
who are partakers of the anointing in one body" [BENGEL].
the same anointing--which ye once for all received, and which
now still abides in you.
of--"concerning."
all things--essential to salvation; the point under discussion.
Not that the believer is made infallible, for no believer here receives
the Spirit in all its fulness, but only the measure needful for keeping
him from soul-destroying error. So the Church, though having the Spirit
in her, is not infallible (for many fallible members can never make an
infallible whole), but is kept from ever wholly losing the saving
truth.
no lie--as Antichristian teaching.
ye shall abide in him--
(1Jo 2:24,
end); even as "the anointing abideth in you." The oldest manuscripts
read the imperative, "abide in Him."
28. little children--Greek, "little sons," as in
1Jo 2:12;
believers of every stage and age.
abide in him--Christ. John repeats his monition with a loving
appellation, as a father addressing dear children.
when--literally, "if"; the uncertainty is not as to the fact,
but the time.
appear--Greek, "be manifested."
we--both writer and readers.
ashamed before him--literally, "from Him"; shrink back
from Him ashamed. Contrast "boldness in the day of judgment,"
1Jo 4:17;
compare
1Jo 3:21; 5:14.
In the Apocalypse (written, therefore, BENGEL
thinks, subsequently), Christ's coming is represented as put off to a
greater distance.
29. The heading of the second division of the Epistle:
"God is righteous; therefore, every one that doeth righteousness is
born of Him." Love is the grand feature and principle of
"righteousness" selected for discussion,
1Jo 2:29-3:3.
If ye know . . . ye know--distinct Greek verbs:
"if ye are aware (are in possession of the knowledge)
. . . ye discern or apprehend also that," &c. Ye are
already aware that God ("He" includes both "the Father,"
of whom the believer is born (end of this verse, and
1Jo 3:1),
and "the Son,"
1Jo 2:1, 23)
is righteous, ye must necessarily, thereby, perceive also the
consequence of that truth, namely, "that everyone that doeth
righteousness (and he alone; literally, the righteousness such
as the righteous God approves) is born of Him." The righteous produceth
the righteous. We are never said to be born again of
Christ, but of God, with whom Christ is one. HOLLAZ in ALFORD defines the
righteousness of God, "It is the divine energy by whose power God
wills and does all things which are conformable to His eternal law,
prescribes suitable laws to His creatures, fulfils His promises to men,
rewards the good, and punishes the ungodly."
doeth--"For the graces (virtues) are practical, and have their
being in being produced (in being exercised); for when they have ceased
to act, or are only about to act, they have not even being"
[ŒCUMENIUS]. "God is righteous, and
therefore the source of righteousness; when then a man doeth
righteousness, we know that the source of his righteousness is God,
that consequently he has acquired by new birth from God that
righteousness which he had not by nature. We argue from his doing
righteousness, to his being born of God. The error of
Pelagians is to conclude that doing righteousness is a condition
of becoming a child of God" [ALFORD most
truly]. Compare
Lu 7:47, 50:
Her much love evinced that her sins were already
forgiven; not, were the condition of her sins being
forgiven.
CHAPTER 3
1Jo 3:1-24.
DISTINGUISHING
MARKS OF THE
CHILDREN OF
GOD AND THE
CHILDREN OF THE
DEVIL.
BROTHERLY
LOVE THE
ESSENCE OF
TRUE
RIGHTEOUSNESS.
1. Behold--calling attention, as to some wonderful exhibition,
little as the world sees to admire. This verse is connected with the
previous
1Jo 2:29,
thus: All our doing of righteousness is a mere sign that God, of
His matchless love, has adopted us as children; it does not save us,
but is a proof that we are saved of His grace.
what manner of--of what surpassing excellence, how gracious on
His part, how precious to us.
love . . . bestowed--He does not say that God hath
given us some gift, but love itself and the fountain of all
honors, the heart itself, and that not for our works or efforts, but of
His grace [LUTHER].
that--"what manner of love"; resulting in, proved by, our being,
&c. The immediate effect aimed at in the bestowal of this love
is, "that we should be called children of God."
should be called--should have received the privilege of such a
glorious title (though seeming so imaginary to the world), along
with the glorious reality. With God to call is to make
really to be. Who so great as God? What nearer relationship than
that of sons? The oldest manuscripts add, "And we ARE SO" really.
therefore--"on this account," because "we are (really) so."
us--the children, like the Father.
it knew him not--namely, the Father. "If they who regard not
God, hold thee in any account, feel alarmed about thy state" [BENGEL]. Contrast
1Jo 5:1.
The world's whole course is one great act of non-recognition of
God.
2. Beloved--by the Father, and therefore by me.
now--in contrast to "not yet." We now already are really
sons, though not recognized as such by the world, and (as the
consequence) we look for the visible manifestation of our sonship,
which not yet has taken place.
doth not yet appear--Greek, "it hath not yet ('at any
time,' Greek aorist) been visibly manifested what we shall
be"--what further glory we shall attain by virtue of this our sonship.
The "what" suggests a something inconceivably glorious.
but--omitted in the oldest manuscripts. Its insertion in
English Version gives a wrong antithesis. It is not, "We do
not yet know manifestly what . . . but we know," &c.
Believers have some degree of the manifestation already, though
the world has not. The connection is, The manifestation to
the world of what we shall be, has not yet taken place; we
know (in general; as a matter of well-assured knowledge; so
the Greek) that when (literally, "if"; expressing no doubt as to
the fact, but only as to the time; also implying the coming preliminary
fact, on which the consequence follows,
Mal 1:6;
Joh 14:3)
He (not "it," namely, that which is not yet manifested
[ALFORD]) shall be manifested
(1Jo 3:5; 2:28),
we shall be like Him (Christ; all sons have a substantial resemblance
to their father, and Christ, whom we shall be like, is "the express
image of the Father's person," so that in resembling Christ, we shall
resemble the Father). We wait for the manifestation (literally,
the "apocalypse"; the same term as is applied to Christ's own
manifestation) of the sons of God. After our natural birth, the
new birth into the life of grace is needed, which is to be followed by
the new birth into the life of glory; the two latter alike are termed
"the regeneration"
(Mt 19:28).
The resurrection of our bodies is a kind of coming out of the womb of
the earth, and being born into another life. Our first temptation was
that we should be like God in knowledge, and by that we fell; but being
raised by Christ, we become truly like Him, by knowing Him as we are
known, and by seeing Him as He is [PEARSON,
Exposition of the Creed]. As the first immortality which Adam
lost was to be able not to die, so the last shall be not to be able to
die. As man's first free choice or will was to be able not to sin, so
our last shall be not to be able to sin [AUGUSTINE, The City of God, 22.30]. The devil
fell by aspiring to God's power; man, by aspiring to his
knowledge; but aspiring after God's goodness, we shall
ever grow in His likeness. The transition from God the Father to
"He," "Him," referring to Christ (who alone is ever said in Scripture
to be manifested; not the Father,
Joh 1:18),
implies the entire unity of the Father and the Son.
for, &c.--Continual beholding generates likeness
(2Co 3:18);
as the face of the moon being always turned towards the sun, reflects
its light and glory.
see him--not in His innermost Godhead, but as manifested in
Christ. None but the pure can see the infinitely Pure One. In all
these passages the Greek is the same verb opsomai; not
denoting the action of seeing, but the state of him to whose eye or
mind the object is presented; hence the Greek verb is always in
the middle or reflexive voice, to perceive and inwardly
appreciate [TITTMANN]. Our spiritual bodies
will appreciate and recognize spiritual beings hereafter, as our
natural bodies now do natural objects.
3. this hope--of being hereafter "like Him." Faith and
love, as well as hope, occur in
1Jo 3:11, 23.
in--rather, "(resting) upon Him"; grounded on His
promises.
purifieth himself--by Christ's Spirit in him
(Joh 15:5,
end). "Thou purifiest thyself, not of thyself, but of Him who comes
that He may dwell in thee" [AUGUSTINE]. One's
justification through faith is presupposed.
as he is pure--unsullied with any uncleanness. The Second
Person, by whom both the Law and Gospel were given.
4. Sin is incompatible with birth from God
(1Jo 3:1-3).
John often sets forth the same truth negatively, which he had
before set forth positively. He had shown, birth from God
involves self-purification; he now shows where sin, that is, the want
of self-purification, is, there is no birth from God.
Whosoever--Greek, "Every one who."
committeth sin--in contrast to
1Jo 3:3,
"Every man that hath this hope in Him purifieth himself"; and
1Jo 3:7,
"He that doeth righteousness."
transgresseth . . . the law--Greek, "committeth
transgression of law." God's law of purity; and so shows he has no such
hope of being hereafter pure as God is pure, and, therefore, that he is
not born of God.
for--Greek, "and."
sin is . . . transgression of . . .
law--definition of sin in general. The Greek having
the article to both, implies that they are convertible terms. The
Greek "sin" (hamartia) is literally, "a missing of the
mark." God's will being that mark to be ever aimed at. "By the law is
the knowledge of sin." The crookedness of a line is shown by being
brought into juxtaposition with a straight ruler.
5. Additional proof of the incompatibility of sin and sonship;
the very object of Christ's manifestation in the flesh was to take
away (by one act, and entirely, aorist) all sins, as the scapegoat
did typically.
and--another proof of the same.
in him is no sin--not "was," but "is," as in
1Jo 3:7,
"He is righteous," and
1Jo 3:3,
"He is pure." Therefore we are to be so.
6. He reasons from Christ's own entire separation from sin, that
those in him must also be separate from it.
abideth in him--as the branch in the vine, by vital union living
by His life.
sinneth not--In so far as he abides in Christ, so far is he free
from all sin. The ideal of the Christian. The life of sin and the life
of God mutually exclude one another, just as darkness and light. In
matter of fact, believers do fall into sins
(1Jo 1:8-10; 2:1, 2);
but all such sins are alien from the life of God, and need Christ's
cleansing blood, without application to which the life of God could not
be maintained. He sinneth not so long as he abideth in Christ.
whosoever sinneth hath not seen him--Greek perfect, "has
not seen, and does not see Him." Again the ideal of Christian
intuition and knowledge is presented
(Mt 7:23).
All sin as such is at variance with the notion of one regenerated. Not
that "whosoever is betrayed into sins has never seen nor known God";
but in so far as sin exists, in that degree the spiritual
intuition and knowledge of God do not exist in him.
neither--"not even." To see spiritually is a further step
than to know; for by knowing we come to seeing by
vivid realization and experimentally.
7, 8. The same truth stated, with the addition that he who sins
is, so far as he sins, "of the devil."
let no man deceive you--as Antinomians try to mislead men.
righteousness--Greek, "the righteousness," namely,
of Christ or God.
he that doeth . . . is righteous--Not his doing
makes him righteous, but his being righteous (justified
by the righteousness of God in Christ,
Ro 10:3-10)
makes him to do righteousness: an inversion common in familiar
language, logical in reality, though not in form, as in
Lu 7:47;
Joh 8:47.
Works do not justify, but the justified man works. We infer from his
doing righteousness that he is already righteous (that
is, has the true and only principle of doing righteousness,
namely, faith), and is therefore born of God
(1Jo 3:9);
just as we might say, The tree that bears good fruit is a good tree,
and has a living root; not that the fruit makes the tree and its
root to be good, but it shows that they are so.
he--Christ.
8. He that committeth sin is of the devil--in contrast to "He
that doeth righteousness,"
1Jo 3:7.
He is a son of the devil
(1Jo 3:10;
Joh 8:44).
John does not, however, say, "born of the devil." as he does "born of
God," for "the devil begets none, nor does he create any; but whoever
imitates the devil becomes a child of the devil by imitating him, not
by proper birth" [AUGUSTINE, Ten Homilies on
the First Epistle of John, Homily 4.10]. From the devil there is
not generation, but corruption [BENGEL].
sinneth from the beginning--from the time that any began to sin
[ALFORD]: from the time that he became what he is,
the devil. He seems to have kept his first estate only a very short
time after his creation [BENGEL]. Since the
fall of man [at the beginning of our world] the devil
is (ever) sinning (this is the force of "sinneth"; he
has sinned from the beginning, is the cause of all sins, and still goes
on sinning; present). As the author of sin, and prince of this world,
he has never ceased to seduce man to sin [LUECKE].
destroy--break up and do away with; bruising and crushing the
serpent's head.
works of the devil--sin, and all its awful consequences. John
argues, Christians cannot do that which Christ came to destroy.
9. Whosoever is born of God--literally, "Everyone that is
begotten of God."
doth not commit sin--His higher nature, as one born or begotten
of God, doth not sin. To be begotten of God and to sin,
are states mutually excluding one another. In so far as one sins, he
makes it doubtful whether he be born of God.
his seed--the living word of God, made by the Holy Spirit the
seed in us of a new life and the continual mean of sanctification.
remaineth--abideth in him (compare Note, see on
1Jo 3:6;
Joh 5:38).
This does not contradict
1Jo 1:8, 9;
the regenerate show the utter incompatibility of sin with
regeneration, by cleansing away every sin into which they may be
betrayed by the old nature, at once in the blood of Christ.
cannot sin, because he is born of God--"because it is of
God that he is born" (so the Greek order, as compared
with the order of the same words in the beginning of the verse); not
"because he was born of God" (the Greek is perfect tense,
which is present in meaning, not aorist); it is not said,
Because a man was once for all born of God he never afterwards can sin;
but, Because he is born of God, the seed abiding now in Him, he cannot
sin; so long as it energetically abides, sin can have no place. Compare
Ge 39:9,
Joseph, "How CAN I do this great wickedness and
sin against God?" The principle within me is at utter variance with it.
The regenerate life is incompatible with sin, and gives the believer a
hatred for sin in every shape, and an unceasing desire to resist it.
"The child of God in this conflict receives indeed wounds daily, but
never throws away his arms or makes peace with his deadly foe" [LUTHER]. The exceptional sins into which the regenerate
are surprised, are owing to the new life principle being for a time
suffered to lie dormant, and to the sword of the Spirit not being drawn
instantly. Sin is ever active, but no longer reigns. The normal
direction of the believer's energies is against sin; the law of God
after the inward man is the ruling principle of his true self
though the old nature, not yet fully deadened, rebels and sins.
Contrast
1Jo 5:18
with Joh 8:34;
compare
Ps 18:22, 23;
32:2, 3; 119:113, 176.
The magnetic needle, the nature of which is always to point to the
pole, is easily turned aside, but always reseeks the pole.
10. children of the devil--(See on
1Jo 3:8;
Ac 13:10).
There is no middle class between the children of God and the children
of the devil.
doeth not righteousness--Contrast
1Jo 2:29.
he that loveth not his brother--
(1Jo 4:8);
a particular instance of that love which is the sum and
fulfilment of all righteousness, and the token (not loud professions,
or even seemingly good works) that distinguishes God's children from
the devil's.
11. the message--"announcement," as of something good; not a
mere command, as the law. The Gospel message of Him who
loved us, announced by His servants, is, that we love the
brethren; not here all mankind, but those who are our brethren in
Christ, children of the same family of God, of whom we have been born
anew.
12. who--not in the Greek.
of that wicked one--Translate, "evil one," to accord with
"Because his own works were evil." Compare
1Jo 3:8,
"of the devil," in contrast to "of God,"
1Jo 3:10.
slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's
righteous--through envy and hatred of his brother's piety, owing to
which God accepted Abel's, but rejected Cain's offering. Enmity from
the first existed between the seed of the woman and the seed of the
serpent.
13. Marvel not--The marvel would be if the world loved you.
the world--of whom Cain is the representative
(1Jo 3:12).
hate you--as Cain hated even his own brother, and that to the
extent of murdering him. The world feels its bad works tacitly reproved
by your good works.
14. We--emphatical; hated though we be by the world, we
know what the world knows not.
know--as an assured fact.
passed--changed our state.
Col 1:13,
"from the power of darkness . . . translated into the kingdom
of His dear Son."
from death unto life--literally, "out of the death (which
enthrals the unregenerate) into the life (of the regenerate)." A
palpable coincidence of language and thought, the beloved disciple
adopting his Lord's words.
because we love the brethren--the ground, not of our passing
over out of death into life, but of our knowing that we have
so. Love, on our part, is the evidence of our
justification and regeneration, not the cause of them. "Let each
go to his own heart; if he find there love to the brethren, let him
feel assured that he has passed from death unto life. Let him not mind
that his glory is only hidden; when the Lord shall come, then shall he
appear in glory. For he has vital energy, but it is still wintertime;
the root has vigor, but the branches are as it were dry; within there
is marrow which is vigorous, within are leaves, within fruits, but they
must wait for summer" [AUGUSTINE].
He that loveth not--Most of the oldest manuscripts omit "his
brother," which makes the statement more general.
abideth--still.
in death--"in the (spiritual) death" (ending in eternal
death) which is the state of all by nature. His want of love
evidences that no saving change has passed over him.
15. hateth--equivalent to "loveth not"
(1Jo 3:14);
there is no medium between the two. "Love and hatred, like light and
darkness, life and death, necessarily replace, as well as necessarily
exclude, one another" [ALFORD].
is a murderer--because indulging in that passion, which, if
followed out to its natural consequences, would make him one. "Whereas,
1Jo 3:16
desires us to lay down our lives for the brethren; duels require
one (awful to say!) to risk his own life, rather than not
deprive another of life" [BENGEL]. God
regards the inward disposition as tantamount to the outward act which
would flow from it. Whomsoever one hates, one wishes to be dead.
hath--Such a one still "abideth in death." It is not his
future state, but his present, which is referred to. He
who hates (that is, loveth not) his brother
(1Jo 3:14),
cannot in this his present state have eternal life abiding in him.
16. What true love to the brethren is, illustrated by the
love of Christ to us.
Hereby--Greek, "Herein."
the love of God--The words "of God" are not in the
original. Translate, "We arrive at the knowledge of love"; we
apprehend what true love is.
he--Christ.
and we--on our part, if absolutely needed for the glory of God,
the good of the Church, or the salvation of a brother.
lives--Christ alone laid down His one life for us all; we
ought to lay down our lives severally for the lives of the
brethren; if not actually, at least virtually, by giving our time,
care, labors, prayers, substance: Non nobis, sed omnibus. Our
life ought not to be dearer to us than God's own Son was to Him. The
apostles and martyrs acted on this principle.
17. this world's good--literally, "livelihood" or substance. If
we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren
(1Jo 3:16),
how much more ought we not to withhold our substance?
seeth--not merely casually, but deliberately
contemplates as a spectator; Greek, "beholds."
shutteth up his bowels of compassion--which had been
momentarily opened by the spectacle of his brother's need. The
"bowels" mean the heart, the seat of compassion.
how--How is it possible that "the love of (that is,
'to') God dwelleth (Greek, 'abideth') in him?" Our
superfluities should yield to the necessities; our comforts, and even
our necessaries in some measure, should yield to the extreme wants of
our brethren. "Faith gives Christ to me; love flowing from faith gives
me to my neighbor."
18. When the venerable John could no longer walk to the meetings
of the Church but was borne thither by his disciples, he always uttered
the same address to the Church; he reminded them of that one
commandment which he had received from Christ Himself, as comprising
all the rest, and forming the distinction of the new covenant, "My
little children, love one another." When the brethren present, wearied
of hearing the same thing so often, asked why he always repeated the
same thing, he replied, "Because it is the commandment of the Lord, and
if this one thing be attained, it is enough" [JEROME].
in word--Greek, "with word . . . with
tongue, but in deed and truth."
19. hereby--Greek, "herein"; in our loving in deed and
in truth
(1Jo 3:18).
we know--The oldest manuscripts have "we shall know," namely, if
we fulfil the command
(1Jo 3:18).
of the truth--that we are real disciples of, and belonging to,
the truth, as it is in Jesus: begotten of God with the word of
truth. Having herein the truth radically, we shall be sure not
to love merely in word and tongue.
(1Jo 3:18).
assure--literally, "persuade," namely, so as to cease to condemn
us; satisfy the questionings and doubts of our consciences as to
whether we be accepted before God or not (compare
Mt 28:14;
Ac 12:20,
"having made Blastus their friend," literally, "persuaded"). The
"heart," as the seat of the feelings, is our inward judge; the
conscience, as the witness, acts either as our justifying
advocate, or our condemning accuser, before God even now.
Joh 8:9,
has "conscience," but the passage is omitted in most old manuscripts.
John nowhere else uses the term "conscience." Peter and Paul alone use
it.
before him--as in the sight of Him, the omniscient Searcher of
hearts. Assurance is designed to be the ordinary experience and
privilege of the believer.
20. LUTHER and BENGEL
take this verse as consoling the believer whom his heart
condemns; and who, therefore, like Peter, appeals from conscience
to Him who is greater than conscience. "Lord, Thou knowest
all things: thou knowest that I love Thee." Peter's conscience,
though condemning him of his sin in denying the Lord, assured him of
his love; but fearing the possibility, owing to his past fall,
of deceiving himself, he appeals to the all-knowing God: so Paul,
1Co 4:3, 4.
So if we be believers, even if our heart condemns us of sin in
general, yet having the one sign of sonship, love, we may still
assure our hearts (some oldest manuscripts read heart,
1Jo 3:19,
as well as
1Jo 3:20),
as knowing that God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all
things. But thus the same Greek is translated "because" in
the beginning, and "(we know) that" in the middle of the verse,
and if the verse were consolatory, it probably would have been,
"Because EVEN if our heart condemn us," &c.
Therefore translate, "Because (rendering the reason why it has
been stated in
1Jo 3:19
to be so important to 'assure our hearts before Him') if our heart
condemn (Greek, 'know [aught] against us';
answering by contrast to 'we shall know that we are of the
truth') us (it is) because God is greater than our heart and
knoweth all things." If our heart judges us unfavorably, we may be sure
that He, knowing more than our heart knows, judges us more unfavorably
still [ALFORD]. A similar ellipsis ("it is")
occurs in
1Co 14:27;
2Co 1:6; 8:23.
The condemning testimony of our conscience is not alone, but is the
echo of the voice of Him who is greater and knoweth all things. Our
hypocrisy in loving by word and tongue, not in deed and
truth, does not escape even our conscience, though weak and knowing
but little, how much less God who knows all things! Still the
consolatory view may be the right one. For the Greek for "we
shall assure our hearts" (see on
1Jo 3:19),
is gain over, persuade so as to be stilled, implying that there
was a previous state of self-condemnation by the heart
(1Jo 3:20),
which, however, is got over by the consolatory thought, "God is
greater than my heart" which condemns me, and "knows all things"
(Greek "ginoskei," "knows," not
"kataginoskei," "condemns"), and therefore knows my
love and desire to serve Him, and knows my frame so as to
pity my weakness of faith. This gaining over the heart to peace
is not so advanced a stage as the having CONFIDENCE towards
God which flows from a heart condemning us not. The first
"because" thus applies to the two alternate cases,
1Jo 3:20, 21
(giving the ground of saying, that having love we shall gain
over, or assure our minds before Him,
1Jo 3:19);
the second "because" applies to the first alternate alone, namely, "if
our heart condemn us." When he reaches the second alternate,
1Jo 3:21,
he states it independently of the former "because" which had connected
it with
1Jo 3:19,
inasmuch as CONFIDENCE toward God is a
farther stage than persuading our hearts, though always preceded
by it.
21. Beloved--There is no "But" contrasting the two cases,
1Jo 3:20, 21,
because "Beloved" sufficiently marks the transition to the case of the
brethren walking in the full confidence of love
(1Jo 3:18).
The two results of our being able to "assure our hearts before Him"
(1Jo 3:19),
and of "our heart condemning us not" (of insincerity as to the
truth in general, and as to LOVE in
particular) are, (1) confidence toward God; (2) a sure answer to our
prayers. John does not mean that all whose hearts do not condemn them,
are therefore safe before God; for some have their conscience seared,
others are ignorant of the truth, and it is not only sincerity,
but sincerity in the truth which can save men. Christians are
those meant here: knowing Christ's precepts and testing themselves by
them.
22. we receive--as a matter of fact, according to His promise.
Believers, as such, ask only what is in accordance with God's will; or
if they ask what God wills not, they bow their will to God's will, and
so God grants them either their request, or something better than it.
because we keep his commandments--Compare
Ps 66:18; 34:15; 145:18, 19.
Not as though our merits earned a hearing for our prayers, but when we
are believers in Christ, all our works of faith being the fruit of
His Spirit in us, are "pleasing in God's sight"; and our prayers
being the voice of the same Spirit of God in us, naturally and
necessarily are answered by Him.
23. Summing up of God's commandments under the Gospel
dispensation in one commandment.
this is his commandment--singular: for faith and
love are not separate commandments, but are indissolubly
united. We cannot truly love one another without faith in
Christ, nor can we truly believe in Him without love.
believe--once for all; Greek aorist.
on the name of his Son--on all that is revealed in the Gospel
concerning Him, and on Himself in respect to His person, offices, and
atoning work.
as he--as Jesus gave us commandment.
24. dwelleth in him--The believer dwelleth in Christ.
and he in him--Christ in the believer. Reciprocity. "Thus he
returns to the great keynote of the Epistle, abide in Him, with
which the former part concluded"
(1Jo 2:28).
hereby--herein we (believers) know that he abideth in us,
namely, from (the presence in us of) the Spirit "which He hath given
us." Thus he prepares, by the mention of the true Spirit, for the
transition to the false "spirit,"
1Jo 4:1-6;
after which he returns again to the subject of love.
CHAPTER 4
1Jo 4:1-21.
TESTS OF
FALSE
PROPHETS.
LOVE, THE
TEST OF
BIRTH FROM
GOD, AND THE
NECESSARY
FRUIT OF
KNOWING
HIS
GREAT
LOVE IN
CHRIST TO
US.
1. Beloved--the affectionate address wherewith he calls their
attention, as to an important subject.
every spirit--which presents itself in the person of a prophet.
The Spirit of truth, and the spirit of error, speak by men's spirits as
their organs. There is but one Spirit of truth, and one spirit of
Antichrist.
try--by the tests
(1Jo 4:2, 3).
All believers are to do so: not merely ecclesiastics. Even an angel's
message should be tested by the word of God: much more men's teachings,
however holy the teachers may seem.
because, &c.--the reason why we must "try," or test the
spirits.
many false prophets--not "prophets" in the sense "foretellers,"
but organs of the spirit that inspires them, teaching
accordingly either truth or error: "many Antichrists."
are gone out--as if from God.
into the world--said alike of good and bad prophets
(2Jo 7).
The world is easily seduced
(1Jo 4:4, 5).
2. Hereby--"Herein."
know . . . the Spirit of God--whether he be, or not,
in those teachers professing to be moved by Him.
Every spirit--that is, Every teacher claiming inspiration
by the HOLY SPIRIT.
confesseth--The truth is taken for granted as established. Man
is required to confess it, that is, in his teaching to profess
it openly.
Jesus Christ is come in the flesh--a twofold truth confessed,
that Jesus is the Christ, and that He is come (the
Greek perfect tense implies not a mere past historical fact, as
the aorist would, but also the present continuance of the fact
and its blessed effects) in the flesh ("clothed with flesh": not
with a mere seeming humanity, as the Docetæ afterwards
taught: He therefore was, previously, something far above flesh). His
flesh implies His death for us, for only by assuming
flesh could He die (for as God He could not),
Heb 2:9, 10, 14, 16;
and His death implies His LOVE for us
(Joh 15:13).
To deny the reality of His flesh is to deny His love, and so
cast away the root which produces all true love on the believer's part
(1Jo 4:9-11, 19).
Rome, by the doctrine of the immaculate conception of the Virgin Mary,
denies Christ's proper humanity.
3. confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the
flesh--IRENÆUS [3.8],
LUCIFER, ORIGEN, on
Mt 25:14,
and Vulgate read, "Every spirit which destroys (sets
aside, or does away with) Jesus (Christ)." CYPRIAN and POLYCARP support
English Version text. The oldest extant manuscripts, which are,
however, centuries after POLYCARP, read, "Every
spirit that confesseth not (that is, refuses to confess) Jesus" (in His
person, and all His offices and divinity), omitting "is come in the
flesh."
ye have heard--from your Christian teachers.
already is it in the world--in the person of the false
prophets
(1Jo 4:1).
4. Ye--emphatical: YE who confess Jesus: in
contrast to "them," the false teachers.
overcome them--
(1Jo 5:4, 5);
instead of being "overcome and brought into (spiritual) bondage" by
them
(2Pe 2:19).
Joh 10:8, 5,
"the sheep did not hear them": "a stranger will they not follow,
but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers."
he that is in you--God, of whom ye are.
he that is in the word--the spirit of Antichrist, the devil,
"the prince of this world."
5. of the world--They derive their spirit and teaching from the
world, "unregenerate human nature, ruled over and possessed by Satan,
the prince of this world" [ALFORD].
speak they of the word--They draw the matter of their
conversation from the life, opinions, and feelings of the world.
the world heareth them--
(Joh 15:18, 19).
The world loves its own.
6. We--true teachers of Christ: in contrast to
them.
are of God--and therefore speak of God: in contrast to
"speak they of the world,"
1Jo 4:5.
knoweth God--as his Father, being a child "of God"
(1Jo 2:13, 14).
heareth us--Compare
Joh 18:37,
"Every one that is of the truth, heareth My voice."
Hereby--
(1Jo 4:2-6);
by their confessing, or not confessing, Jesus; by the kind of reception
given them respectively by those who know God, and by those who are of
the world and not of God.
spirit of truth--the Spirit which comes from God and
teaches truth.
spirit of error--the spirit which comes from Satan and
seduces into error.
7. Resumption of the main theme
(1Jo 2:29).
Love, the sum of righteousness, is the test of our being
born of God. Love flows from a sense of God's love to us:
compare
1Jo 4:9
with 1Jo 3:16,
which
1Jo 4:9
resumes; and
1Jo 4:13
with 1Jo 3:24,
which similarly
1Jo 4:13
resumes. At the same time,
1Jo 4:7-21
is connected with the immediately preceding context,
1Jo 4:2
setting forth Christ's incarnation, the great proof of God's
love
(1Jo 4:10).
Beloved--an address appropriate to his subject, "love."
love--All love is from God as its fountain:
especially that embodiment of love, God manifest in the flesh. The
Father also is love
(1Jo 4:8).
The Holy Ghost sheds love as its first fruit
abroad in the heart.
knoweth God--spiritually, experimentally, and habitually.
8. knoweth not--Greek aorist: not only knoweth not
now, but never knew, has not once for all known God.
God is love--There is no Greek article to love,
but to God; therefore we cannot translate, Love is God.
God is fundamentally and essentially LOVE: not
merely is loving, for then John's argument would not stand; for
the conclusion from the premises then would be this, This man is not
loving: God is loving; therefore he knoweth not God IN SO FAR AS GOD IS LOVING; still
he might know Him in His other attributes. But when we take love
as God's essence, the argument is sound: This man doth not love,
and therefore knows not love: God is essentially love, therefore he
knows not God.
9. toward us--Greek, "in our case."
sent--Greek, "hath sent."
into the world--a proof against Socinians, that the Son existed
before He was "sent into the world." Otherwise, too, He could not have
been our life
(1Jo 4:9),
our "propitiation"
(1Jo 4:10),
or our "Saviour"
(1Jo 4:14).
It is the grand proof of God's love, His having sent "His
only-begotten Son, that we might live through Him," who is the
Life, and who has redeemed our forfeited life; and it is also the
grand motive to our mutual love.
10. Herein is love--love in the abstract: love, in
its highest ideal, is herein. The love was all on God's side, none on
ours.
not that we loved God--though so altogether worthy of love.
he loved us--though so altogether unworthy of love. The
Greek aorist expresses, Not that we did any act of love
at any time to God, but that He did the act of love to us
in sending Christ.
11. God's love to us is the grand motive for our love to one
another
(1Jo 3:16).
if--as we all admit as a fact.
we . . . also--as being born of God, and
therefore resembling our Father who is love. In proportion as we
appreciate God's love to us, we love Him and also the brethren,
the children (by regeneration) of the same God, the representatives of
the unseen God.
12. God, whom no man hath seen at any time, hath
appointed His children as the visible recipients of our outward
kindness which flows from love to Himself, "whom not having
seen, we love," compare Notes,
1Jo 4:11,
1Jo 4:19, 20.
Thus
1Jo 4:12
explains why, instead (in
1Jo 4:11)
of saying, "If God so loved us, we ought also to love God," he
said, "We ought also to love one another."
If we love one another, God dwelleth in us--for God is love; and
it must have been from Him dwelling in us that we drew the real love we
bear to the brethren
(1Jo 4:8, 16).
John discusses this in
1Jo 4:13-16.
his love--rather, "the love of Him," that is, "to Him"
(1Jo 2:5),
evinced by our love to His representatives, our brethren.
is perfected in us--John discusses this in
1Jo 4:17-19.
Compare
1Jo 2:5,
"is perfected," that is, attains its proper maturity.
13. Hereby--"Herein." The token vouchsafed to us of God's
dwelling (Greek, "abide") in us, though we see Him not, is this,
that He hath given us "of His Spirit"
(1Jo 3:24).
Where the Spirit of God is, there God is. ONE
Spirit dwells in the Church: each believer receives a measure "of" that
Spirit in the proportion God thinks fit. Love is His first-fruit
(Ga 5:22).
In Jesus alone the Spirit dwelt without measure
(Joh 3:34).
14. And we--primarily, we apostles, Christ's appointed
eye-witnesses to testify to the facts concerning Him. The internal
evidence of the indwelling Spirit
(1Jo 4:13)
is corroborated by the external evidence of the eye-witnesses to the
fact of the Father having "sent His Son to be the Saviour of the
world."
seen--Greek, "contemplated," "attentively beheld"
(see on
1Jo 1:1).
sent--Greek, "hath sent": not an entirely past
fact (aorist), but one of which the effects continue (perfect
tense).
15. shall confess--once for all: so the Greek aorist
means.
that Jesus is the Son of God--and therefore "the Saviour of the
world"
(1Jo 4:14).
16. And we--John and his readers (not as
1Jo 4:14,
the apostles only).
known and believed--True faith, according to John, is a
faith of knowledge and experience: true knowledge is a
knowledge of faith [LUECKE].
to us--Greek, "in our case" (see on
1Jo 4:9).
dwelleth--Greek, "abideth." Compare with this verse,
1Jo 4:7.
17, 18. (Compare
1Jo 3:19-21.)
our love--rather as the Greek, "LOVE
(in the abstract, the principle of love [ALFORD])
is made perfect (in its relations) with us." Love dwelling in us
advances to its consummation "with us" that is, as it is
concerned with us: so Greek.
Lu 1:58,
"showed mercy upon (literally, 'with') her":
2Jo 2,
the truth "shall be with us for ever."
boldness--"confidence": the same Greek as
1Jo 3:21,
to which this passage is parallel. The opposite of "fear,"
1Jo 4:18.
Herein is our love perfected, namely, in God dwelling in us,
and our dwelling in God
(1Jo 4:16),
involving as its result "that we can have confidence (or
boldness) in the day of judgment" (so terrible to all other men,
Ac 24:25;
Ro 2:16).
because, &c.--The ground of our "confidence" is, "because
even as He (Christ) is, we also are in this world" (and He will not, in
that day, condemn those who are like Himself), that is, we are
righteous as He is righteous, especially in respect to that
which is the sum of righteousness, love
(1Jo 3:14).
Christ IS righteous, and love itself, in
heaven: so are we, His members, who are still "in this world." Our
oneness with Him even now in His exalted position above
(Eph 2:6),
so that all that belongs to Him of righteousness, &c., belongs to us
also by perfect imputation and progressive impartation, is the ground
of our love being perfected so that we can have confidence in
the day of judgment. We are in, not of, this
world.
18. Fear has no place in love. Bold confidence
(1Jo 4:17),
based on love, cannot coexist with fear. Love, which,
when perfected, gives bold confidence, casts out fear
(compare
Heb 2:14, 15).
The design of Christ's propitiatory death was to deliver from
this bondage of fear.
but--"nay" [ALFORD].
fear hath torment--Greek, "punishment." Fear is always
revolving in the mind the punishment deserved [ESTIUS]. Fear, by anticipating punishment (through
consciousness of deserving it), has it even now, that is, the foretaste
of it. Perfect love is incompatible with such a self-punishing
fear. Godly fear of offending God is quite distinct from slavish
fear of consciously deserved punishment. The latter fear is
natural to us all until love casts it out. "Men's states
vary: one is without fear and love; another, with fear without love;
another, with fear and love; another, without fear with love" [BENGEL].
19. him--omitted in the oldest manuscripts. Translate, We
(emphatical: WE on our part) love (in general:
love alike Him, and the brethren, and our fellow
men), because He (emphatical: answering to "we"; because it was
He who) first loved us in sending His Son (Greek aorist of a
definite act at a point of time). He was the first to love us: this
thought ought to create in us love casting out fear
(1Jo 4:18).
20. loveth not . . . brother whom he hath seen, how can he
love God whom he hath not seen--It is easier for us, influenced as
we are here by sense, to direct love towards one within the range of
our senses than towards One unseen, appreciable only by faith. "Nature
is prior to grace; and we by nature love things seen, before we love
things unseen" [ESTIUS]. The eyes are our
leaders in love. "Seeing is an incentive to love" [ŒCUMENIUS]. If we do not love the brethren, the
visible representatives of God, how can we love God, the
invisible One, whose children they are? The true ideal of man,
lost in Adam, is realized in Christ, in whom God is revealed as He is,
and man as he ought to be. Thus, by faith in Christ, we learn to love
both the true God, and the true man, and so to love the brethren as
bearing His image.
hath seen--and continually sees.
21. Besides the argument
(1Jo 4:20)
from the common feeling of men, he here adds a stronger one from God's
express commandment
(Mt 22:39).
He who loves, will do what the object of his love wishes.
he who loveth God--he who wishes to be regarded by God as loving
Him.
CHAPTER 5
1Jo 5:1-21.
WHO
ARE THE
BRETHREN
ESPECIALLY TO
BE
LOVED
(1Jo 4:21);
OBEDIENCE, THE
TEST OF
LOVE,
EASY THROUGH
FAITH, WHICH
OVERCOMES THE
WORLD.
LAST
PORTION OF THE
EPISTLE.
THE
SPIRIT'S
WITNESS TO THE
BELIEVER'S
SPIRITUAL
LIFE.
TRUTHS
REPEATED AT THE
CLOSE:
FAREWELL
WARNING.
1. Reason why our "brother"
(1Jo 4:21)
is entitled to such love, namely, because he is "born (begotten)
of God": so that if we want to show our love to God, we must
show it to God's visible representative.
Whosoever--Greek, "Everyone that." He could not be our
"Jesus" (God-Saviour) unless He were "the Christ"; for He could not
reveal the way of salvation, except He were a prophet: He could
not work out that salvation, except He were a priest: He could
not confer that salvation upon us, except He were a king: He
could not be prophet, priest, and king, except He were
the Christ [PEARSON, Exposition of the
Creed].
born--Translate, "begotten," as in the latter part of the verse,
the Greek being the same. Christ is the "only-begotten Son" by
generation; we become begotten sons of God by
regeneration and adoption.
every one that loveth him that begat--sincerely, not in mere
profession
(1Jo 4:20).
loveth him also that is begotten of him--namely, "his brethren"
(1Jo 4:21).
2. By--Greek, "In." As our love to the brethren is
the sign and test of our love to God, so (John here says) our
love to God (tested by our "keeping his commandments") is,
conversely, the ground and only true basis of love to our
brother.
we know--John means here, not the outward criteria of
genuine brotherly love, but the inward spiritual criteria of it,
consciousness of love to God manifested in a hearty keeping of
His commandments. When we have this inwardly and outwardly confirmed
love to God, we can know assuredly that we truly love
the children of God. "Love to one's brother is prior,
according to the order of nature (see on
1Jo 4:20);
love to God is so, according to the order of grace
(1Jo 5:2).
At one time the former is more immediately known, at another time the
latter, according as the mind is more engaged in human relations or in
what concerns the divine honor" [ESTIUS]. John
shows what true love is, namely, that which is referred to God
as its first object. As previously John urged the effect, so now he
urges the cause. For he wishes mutual love to be so cultivated among
us, as that God should always be placed first
[CALVIN].
3. this is--the love of God consists in this.
not grievous--as so many think them. It is "the way of the
transgressor" that "is hard." What makes them to the regenerate "not
grievous," is faith which "overcometh the world"
(1Jo 5:4):
in proportion as faith is strong, the grievousness of God's
commandments to the rebellious flesh is overcome. The reason why
believers feel any degree of irksomeness in God's commandments is, they
do not realize fully by faith the privileges of their spiritual
life.
4. For--(See on
1Jo 5:3).
The reason why "His commandments are not grievous." Though there is a
conflict in keeping them, the sue for the whole body of the regenerate
is victory over every opposing influence; meanwhile there is a present
joy to each believer in keeping them which makes them "not
grievous."
whatsoever--Greek, "all that is begotten of God."
The neuter expresses the universal whole, or aggregate of the
regenerate, regarded as one collective body
Joh 3:6; 6:37, 39,
"where BENGEL remarks, that in Jesus' discourses,
what the Father has given Him is called, in the singular number and
neuter gender, all whatsoever; those who come to the Son
are described in the masculine gender and plural number, they
all, or singular, every one. The Father has given, as it
were, the whole mass to the Son, that all whom He gave may be
one whole: that universal whole the Son singly evolves,
in the execution of the divine plan."
overcometh--habitually.
the world--all that is opposed to keeping the commandments of
God, or draws us off from God, in this world, including our corrupt
flesh, on which the world's blandishments or threats act, as
also including Satan, the prince of this world
(Joh 12:31; 14:30; 16:11).
this is the victory that overcometh--Greek aorist,
". . . that hath (already) overcome the world":
the victory (where faith is) hereby is implied as having
been already obtained
(1Jo 2:13; 4:4).
5. Who--"Who" else "but he that believeth that Jesus is
the Son of God:" "the Christ"
(1Jo 5:1)?
Confirming, by a triumphant question defying all contradiction, as an
undeniable fact,
1Jo 5:4,
that the victory which overcomes the world is faith. For
it is by believing: that we are made one with Jesus the Son
of God, so that we partake of His victory over the world,
and have dwelling in us One greater than he who is in the world
(1Jo 4:4).
"Survey the whole world, and show me even one of whom it can be
affirmed with truth that he overcomes the world, who is not a
Christian, and endowed with this faith" [EPISCOPIUS in ALFORD].
6. This--the Person mentioned in
1Jo 5:5.
This Jesus.
he that came by water and blood--"by water," when His ministry
was inaugurated by baptism in the Jordan, and He received the Father's
testimony to His Messiahship and divine Sonship. Compare
1Jo 5:5,
"believeth that Jesus is the Son of God," with
Joh 1:33, 34,
"The Spirit . . . remaining on Him . . . I saw and
bare record that this is the Son of God"; and
1Jo 5:8,
below, "there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit,
and the water, and the blood." Corresponding to this is the baptism
of water and the Spirit which He has instituted as a standing seal
and mean of initiatory incorporation with Him.
and blood--He came by "the blood of His cross" (so "by" is used,
Heb 9:12:
"by," that is, with, "His own blood He entered in once into the
holy place"): a fact seen and so solemnly witnessed to by
John. "These two past facts in the Lord's life are this abiding
testimony to us, by virtue of the permanent application to us of
their cleansing and atoning power."
Jesus Christ--not a mere appellation, but a solemn assertion of
the Lord's Person and Messiahship.
not by, &c.--Greek, "not IN
the water only, but IN the water and
IN (so oldest manuscripts add) the blood."
As "by" implies the mean through, or with, which
He came: so "in," the element in which He came. "The"
implies that the water and the blood were sacred and
well-known symbols. John Baptist came only baptizing with water, and
therefore was not the Messiah. Jesus came first to undergo
Himself the double baptism of water and blood, and then to baptize us
with the Spirit-cleansing, of which water is the sacramental
seal, and with His atoning blood, the efficacy of which, once
for all shed, is perpetual in the Church; and therefore is the
Messiah. It was His shed blood which first gave water
baptism its spiritual significancy. We are baptized into His
death: the grand point of union between us and Him, and, through
Him, between us and God.
it is the Spirit, &c.--The Holy Spirit is an additional
witness (compare
1Jo 5:7),
besides the water and the blood, to Jesus' Sonship
and Messiahship. The Spirit attested these truths at Jesus'
baptism by descending on Him, and throughout His ministry by enabling
Him to speak and do what man never before or since has spoken or, done;
and "it is the Spirit that beareth witness" of Christ, now permanently
in the Church: both in the inspired New Testament Scriptures, and in
the hearts of believers, and in the spiritual reception of baptism and
the Lord's Supper.
because the Spirit is truth--It is His essential truth
which gives His witness such infallible authority.
7. three--Two or three witnesses were required by law to
constitute adequate testimony. The only Greek manuscripts in
any form which support the words, "in heaven, the Father, the Word,
and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one; and there are three that
bear witness in earth," are the Montfortianus of Dublin, copied
evidently from the modern Latin Vulgate; the Ravianus,
copied from the Complutensian Polyglot; a manuscript at Naples,
with the words added in the Margin by a recent hand;
Ottobonianus, 298, of the fifteenth century, the Greek of
which is a mere translation of the accompanying Latin. All the
old versions omit the words. The oldest manuscripts of the
Vulgate omit them: the earliest Vulgate manuscript which
has them being Wizanburgensis, 99, of the eighth century. A
scholium quoted in Matthæi, shows that the words did not
arise from fraud; for in the words, in all Greek manuscripts
"there are three that bear record," as the Scholiast notices,
the word "three" is masculine, because the three things (the
Spirit, the water, and the blood) are SYMBOLS
OF THE TRINITY. To this CYPRIAN, 196, also refers, "Of the Father, Son and
Holy Spirit, it is written, 'And these three are one' (a
unity)." There must be some mystical truth implied in using
"three" (Greek) in the masculine, though the
antecedents, "Spirit, water, and blood," are neuter. That THE TRINITY was the truth meant is
a natural inference: the triad specified pointing to a still Higher
Trinity; as is plain also from
1Jo 5:9,
"the witness of GOD," referring to the
Trinity alluded to in the Spirit, water, and blood. It was
therefore first written as a marginal comment to complete the
sense of the text, and then, as early at least as the eighth
century, was introduced into the text of the Latin Vulgate. The
testimony, however, could only be borne on earth to men, not in
heaven. The marginal comment, therefore, that inserted "in
heaven," was inappropriate. It is on earth that the context
evidently requires the witness of the three, the Spirit, the
water, and the blood, to be borne: mystically setting forth
the divine triune witnesses, the Father, the Spirit, and the
Son. LUECKE notices as internal evidence against
the words, John never uses "the Father" and "the Word" as correlates,
but, like other New Testament writers, associates "the Son" with "the
Father," and always refers "the Word" to "God" as its correlate, not
"the Father." Vigilius, at the end of the fifth century, is the first
who quotes the disputed words as in the text; but no Greek
manuscript earlier than the fifteenth is extant with them. The
term "Trinity" occurs first in the third century in TERTULLIAN [Against Praxeas, 3].
8. agree in one--"tend unto one result"; their agreeing
testimony to Jesus' Sonship and Messiahship they give by the
sacramental grace in the water of baptism, received by the
penitent believer, by the atoning efficacy of His blood, and by
the internal witness of His Spirit
(1Jo 5:10):
answering to the testimony given to Jesus' Sonship and
Messiahship by His baptism, His crucifixion, and the Spirit's
manifestations in Him (see on
1Jo 5:6).
It was by His coming by water (that is, His baptism in Jordan)
that Jesus was solemnly inaugurated in office, and revealed Himself as
Messiah; this must have been peculiarly important in John's estimation,
who was first led to Christ by the testimony of the Baptist. By the
baptism then received by Christ, and by His redeeming
blood-shedding, and by that which the Spirit of God, whose
witness is infallible, has effected, and still effects, by Him, the
Spirit, the water, and the blood, unite, as the
threefold witness, to verify His divine Messiahship [NEANDER].
9. If, &c.--We do accept (and rightly so) the witness of
veracious men, fallible though they be; much more ought we to accept
the infallible witness of God (the Father). "The testimony of
the Father is, as it were, the basis of the testimony of the Word and
of the Holy Spirit; just as the testimony of the Spirit is, as
it were, the basis of the testimony of the water and the
blood" [BENGEL].
for--This principle applies in the present case,
FOR, &c.
which--in the oldest manuscripts, "because He hath given
testimony concerning His Son." What that testimony is we find above in
1Jo 5:1, 5,
"Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God"; and below in
1Jo 5:10, 11.
10. hath the witness--of God, by His Spirit
(1Jo 5:8).
in himself--God's Spirit dwelling in him and witnessing
that "Jesus is the Lord," "the Christ," and "the Son of God"
(1Jo 5:1, 5).
The witness of the Spirit in the believer himself to his
own sonship is not here expressed, but follows as a consequence of
believing the witness of God to Jesus' divine Sonship.
believeth not God--credits not His witness.
made him a liar--a consequence which many who virtually, or even
avowedly, do not believe, may well startle back from as fearful
blasphemy and presumption
(1Jo 1:10).
believeth not the record--Greek, "believeth not
IN the record, or witness." Refusal to
credit God's testimony ("believeth not God") is involved in
refusal to believe IN (to rest one's trust
in) Jesus Christ, the object of God's record or
testimony. "Divine "faith" is an assent unto something as
credible upon the testimony of God. This is the highest kind of
faith; because the object hath the highest credibility, because
grounded upon the testimony of God, which is infallible" [PEARSON, Exposition of the Creed]. "The authority
on which we believe is divine; the doctrine which we follow is divine"
[LEO].
gave--Greek, "hath testified, and now testifies."
of--concerning.
11. hath given--Greek, aorist: "gave" once for all. Not
only "promised" it.
life is in his Son--essentially
(Joh 1:4; 11:25; 14:6);
bodily
(Col 2:9);
operatively
(2Ti 1:10)
[LANGE in ALFORD]. It is in
the second Adam, the Son of God, that this life is secured to
us, which, if left to depend on us, we should lose, like the first
Adam.
12. the Son . . . life--Greek,
"THE life." BENGEL remarks,
The verse has two clauses: in the former the Son is mentioned without
the addition "of God," for believers know the Son: in the second
clause the addition "of God" is made, that unbelievers may know thereby
what a serious thing it is not to have Him. In the former clause "has"
bears the emphasis; in the second, life. To have the Son
is to be able to say as the bride, "I am my Beloved's, and my
Beloved is mine"
[So 6:3].
Faith is the mean whereby the regenerate
HAVE Christ as a present possession, and in
having Him have life in its germ and reality now, and shall have
life in its fully developed manifestation hereafter. Eternal
life here is: (1) initial, and is an earnest of that which
is to follow; in the intermediate state (2) partial, belonging
but to a part of a man, though that is his nobler part, the soul
separated from the body; at and after the resurrection (3)
perfectional. This life is not only natural, consisting of the
union of the soul and the body (as that of the reprobate in eternal
pain, which ought to be termed death eternal, not life),
but also spiritual, the union of the soul to God, and supremely blessed
for ever (for life is another term for happiness) [PEARSON, Exposition of the Creed].
13. The oldest manuscripts and versions read, "These things have
I written unto you [omitting 'that believe on the name of the Son of
God'] that ye may know that ye have eternal life (compare
1Jo 5:11),
THOSE (of you I mean) WHO
believe (not as English Version reads, 'and that ye may
believe') on the name of the Son of God." English Version,
in the latter clause, will mean, "that ye may continue to
believe," &c. (compare
1Jo 5:12).
These things--This Epistle. He, towards the close of his Gospel
(Joh 20:30, 31),
wrote similarly, stating his purpose in having written. In
1Jo 1:4
he states the object of his writing this Epistle to be, "that your joy
may be full." To "know that we have eternal life" is the sure
way to "joy in God."
14. the confidence--boldness
(1Jo 4:17)
in prayer, which results from knowing that we have eternal life
(1Jo 5:13;
1Jo 3:19, 22).
according to his will--which is the believer's will, and which
is therefore no restraint to his prayers. In so far as God's will is
not our will, we are not abiding in faith, and our prayers are not
accepted. ALFORD well says, If we knew
God's will thoroughly, and submitted to it heartily, it would be
impossible for us to ask anything for the spirit or for the body which
He should not perform; it is this ideal state which the apostle has in
view. It is the Spirit who teaches us inwardly, and Himself in
us asks according to the will of God.
15. hear--Greek, "that He heareth us."
we have the petitions that we desired of him--We have, as
present possessions, everything whatsoever we desired
(asked) from Him. Not one of our past prayers
offered in faith, according to His will, is lost. Like Hannah,
we can rejoice over them as granted even before the event; and can
recognize the event when it comes to pass, as not from chance, but
obtained by our past prayers. Compare also Jehoshaphat's believing
confidence in the issue of his prayers, so much so that he appointed
singers to praise the Lord beforehand.
16. If any . . . see--on any particular occasion;
Greek aorist.
his brother--a fellow Christian.
sin a sin--in the act of sinning, and continuing in the sin:
present.
not unto death--provided that it is not unto death.
he shall give--The asker shall be the means, by his
intercessory prayer, of God giving life to the sinning brother.
Kindly reproof ought to accompany his intercessions. Life was in
process of being forfeited by the sinning brother when the believer's
intercession obtained its restoration.
for them--resuming the proviso put forth in the beginning of the
verse. "Provided that the sin is not unto death." "Shall give life," I
say, to, that is, obtain life "for (in the case of) them
that sin not unto death."
I do not say that he shall pray for it--The Greek for
"pray" means a REQUEST as of one on an equality,
or at least on terms of familiarity, with him from whom the favor is
sought. "The Christian intercessor for his brethren, John declares,
shall not assume the authority which would be implied in making request
for a sinner who has sinned the sin unto death
(1Sa 15:35; 16:1;
Mr 3:29),
that it might be forgiven him" [TRENCH, Greek
Synonyms of the New Testament]. Compare
De 3:26.
Greek "ask" implies the humble petition of an inferior; so that
our Lord never uses it, but always uses (Greek) "request."
Martha, from ignorance, once uses "ask" in His case
(Joh 11:22).
"Asking" for a brother sinning not unto death, is a humble petition in
consonance with God's will. To "request" for a sin unto death
[intercede, as it were, authoritatively for it, as though we
were more merciful than God] would savor of presumption; prescribing to
God in a matter which lies out of the bounds of our brotherly yearning
(because one sinning unto death would thereby be demonstrated not to
be, nor ever to have been, truly a brother,
1Jo 2:19),
how He shall inflict and withhold His righteous judgments. Jesus
Himself intercedes, not for the world which hardens itself in unbelief,
but for those given to Him out of the world.
17. "Every unrighteousness (even that of believers, compare
1Jo 1:9; 3:4.
Every coming short of right) is sin"; (but) not every sin is the
sin unto death.
and there is a sin not unto death--in the case of which,
therefore, believers may intercede. Death and life stand
in correlative opposition
(1Jo 5:11-13).
The sin unto death must be one tending "towards" (so the
Greek), and so resulting in, death. ALFORD makes it to be an appreciable ACT of sin, namely,
the denying Jesus to be the Christ, the Son of God (in contrast
to confess this truth,
1Jo 5:1, 5),
1Jo 2:19, 22; 4:2, 3; 5:10.
Such wilful deniers of Christ are not to be received into one's house,
or wished "God speed." Still, I think with BENGEL,
not merely the act, but also the state of apostasy
accompanying the act, is included--a "state of soul in which
faith, love, and hope, in short, the new life, is extinguished. The
chief commandment is faith and love. Therefore, the chief
sin is that by which faith and love are destroyed. In the former case
is life; in the latter, death. As long as it is not evident (see
on
1Jo 5:16,
on 'see') that it is a sin unto death, it is lawful to pray. But when
it is deliberate rejection of grace, and the man puts from him life
thereby, how can others procure for him life?" Contrast
Jas 5:14-18.
Compare
Mt 12:31, 32
as to the wilful rejection of Christ, and resistance to the Holy
Ghost's plain testimony to Him as the divine Messiah. Jesus, on the
cross, pleaded only for those who KNEW NOT what
they were doing in crucifying Him, not for those wilfully resisting
grace and knowledge. If we pray for the impenitent, it must be
with humble reference of the matter to God's will, not with the
intercessory request which we should offer for a brother
when erring.
18.
(1Jo 3:9.)
We know--Thrice repeated emphatically, to enforce the three
truths which the words preface, as matters of the brethren's joint
experimental knowledge. This
1Jo 5:18
warns against abusing
1Jo 5:16, 17,
as warranting carnal security.
whosoever--Greek, "every one who." Not only advanced
believers, but every one who is born again, "sinneth not."
he that is begotten--Greek aorist, "has been (once for
all in past time) begotten of God"; in the beginning of the
verse it is perfect. "Is begotten," or "born," as a continuing
state.
keepeth himself--The Vulgate translates, "The having been
begotten of God keepeth HIM" (so one of the oldest
manuscripts reads): so ALFORD. Literally, "He
having been begotten of God (nominative pendent), it (the divine
generation implied in the nominative) keepeth him." So
1Jo 3:9,
"His seed remaineth in him." Still, in English Version reading,
God's working by His Spirit inwardly, and man's working under the power
of that Spirit as a responsible agent, is what often occurs elsewhere.
That God must keep us, if we are to keep ourselves
from evil, is certain. Compare
Joh 17:15
especially with this verse.
that wicked one toucheth him not--so as to hurt him. In so far
as he realizes his regeneration-life, the prince of this world hath
nothing in him to fasten his deadly temptations on, as in Christ's
own case. His divine regeneration has severed once for all his
connection with the prince of this world.
19. world lieth in wickedness--rather, "lieth in the wicked
one," as the Greek is translated in
1Jo 5:18;
1Jo 2:13, 14;
compare
1Jo 4:4;
Joh 17:14, 15.
The world lieth in the power of, and abiding in, the wicked one,
as the resting-place and lord of his slaves; compare "abideth in
death,"
1Jo 3:14;
contrast
1Jo 5:20,
"we are in Him that is true." While the believer has been delivered out
of his power, the whole world lieth helpless and motionless
still in it, just as it was; including the wise, great, respectable,
and all who are not by vital union in Christ.
20. Summary of our Christian privileges.
is come--is present, having come. "HE IS
HERE--all is full of Him--His incarnation, work, and abiding
presence, is to us a living fact" [ALFORD].
given us an understanding--Christ's, office is to give the inner
spiritual understanding to discern the things of God.
that we may know--Some oldest manuscripts read, "(so) that we
know."
him that is true--God, as opposed to every kind of idol
or false god
(1Jo 5:21).
Jesus, by virtue of His oneness with God, is also "He that is true"
(Re 3:7).
even--"we are in the true" God, by virtue of being
"in His Son Jesus Christ."
This is the true God--"This Jesus Christ (the last-named
Person) is the true God" (identifying Him thus with the Father in His
attribute, "the only true God,"
Joh 17:3,
primarily attributed to the Father).
and eternal life--predicated of the Son of God;
ALFORD wrongly says, He was the life, but
not eternal life. The Father is indeed eternal life as
its source, but the Son also is that eternal life manifested, as
the very passage
(1Jo 1:2)
which ALFORD quotes, proves against him. Compare
also
1Jo 5:11, 13.
Plainly it is as the Mediator of ETERNAL
LIFE to us that Christ is here contemplated. The
Greek is, "The true God and eternal life is this" Jesus Christ,
that is, In believing in Him we believe in the true God, and have
eternal life. The Son is called "He that is TRUE,"
Re 3:7,
as here. This naturally prepares the way for warning against
false gods
(1Jo 5:21).
Jesus Christ is the only "express image of God's person" which is
sanctioned, the only true visible manifestation of God. All other
representations of God are forbidden as idols. Thus the Epistle
closes as it began
(1Jo 1:1, 2).
21. Affectionate parting caution.
from idols--Christians were then everywhere surrounded by
idolaters, with whom it was impossible to avoid intercourse.
Hence the need of being on their guard against any even indirect
compromise or act of communion with idolatry. Some at Pergamos, in the
region whence John wrote, fell into the snare of eating things
sacrificed to idols. The moment we cease to abide "in Him that is true
(by abiding) in Jesus Christ," we become part of "the world that lieth
in the wicked one," given up to spiritual, if not in all places
literal, idolatry
(Eph 5:5;
Col 3:5).
[Table of Contents]
[Previous]
[Next]
|
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
|
|